User talk:Basanthjain

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at B. P. Acharya. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you have been doing is factually wrong.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv^🍁 04:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources!

Basanthjain, it is indeed important for Wikipedia to get things right, and in particular not to malign living people. However, this is an encyclopedia. We summarize what reliable sources have published. This is one of our basic rules: verifiability. I refer you to the "welcome" template that was placed on this talk page in 2016: see here. That's one of the templates I use myself in welcoming new editors, because it has lots of links to explanations of how we do things and the terminology we use.

As I wrote at Talk:B. P. Acharya, I searched for press reports of what happened in the court case and found nothing after February 2017. You have now written there "Cases were quashed in HC" (I am guessing you mean high court?) but where is a source we can cite? The accusation and his arrest and surrender are all over the press record, so the matter has to be in the article, because we base articles on what has been published. If the case was dismissed, it's urgent we find a source so we can include that resolution. Since you are now blocked and can only edit here, I am asking you here. Please, a source! We can't add that information on your say-so. There must be something published somewhere, preferably in the papers but failing that in an official judicial announcement. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]