User talk:Bartacus1704

Welcome!

Hello, Bartacus1704, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Zero Point Frontiers Corp, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 02:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zero Point Frontiers Corp

A tag has been placed on Zero Point Frontiers Corp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 02:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Margaret I. Cuomo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

News, O Magazine, Parade, People, Prevention, Redbook, Vogue and Women's Day, and on-line sites (DoctorOz.com, Glamour.com, DailyBeast.com, Prevention.com.<ref name=Purdue>{{cite web|last=Couzens|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:LessCancer.org (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:LessCancer.org.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BethNaught (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great!

I think it's great that you created an article on Margaret I. Cuomo! Now, I might be able to create a template for her father, and add it to his children, Daniellagreen ^(talk) ^(cont) 04:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LessCancer.org (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LessCancer.org and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 00:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bartacus1704, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 00:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:LessCancer.org concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:LessCancer.org, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LessCancer.org

Hello, Bartacus1704. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "LessCancer.org".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:LessCancer.org}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article can be deleted. It has been accepted in the main Wikipedia space as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Generation_Choices_Foundation.

Thanks!

Bart

Conflict of Interest, Next Generation Choices Foundation, and welcome!

Hi Bart,

First and foremost, welcome to the Wikipedia community. I've noticed that you wrote Next Generation Choices Foundation and added Next Generation Choices Foundation-related statements on several pages. If you are receiving compensation for your on-wiki work, you must disclose your employer and the nature of the affiliation on your user page, on the talk page for any page on which you made paid contributions, or in the edit summary of the edits for which you were paid. For Wikipedia's full guideline on paid contributions, see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Failure to disclose paid contributions may result in a block from the Wikipedia community.

If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on this page, or on talk page. Seattle (talk) 01:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My paid Next Generation Choices affiliation has been part of my profile page for at least a year.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bill Couzens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Couzens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Couzens (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PureRED | talk to me | 18:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing in Wikipedia

Hi Bartacus1704. I work on issues of advocacy, paid editing, and conflict of interest here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing.

You disclosed here last year, that you are a paid editor on behalf of Next Generation Choices Foundation, and you have disclosed at that article and at Bill Couzens.

Three things.

Would you please clarify if Ronald B. Herberman, Margaret I. Cuomo, SciStarter and Darlene Cavalier were also paid work? Any others?

The Herberman and Cuomo articles were paid work, the Cavalier work was not. /bl

Also you seem to understand that you should disclose, which is oblitatory under the ToU and PAID policy, but you have been editing directly on behalf of your clients. However, the COI guideline says that directly editing on behalf of clients (or where an editor has any COI) is strongly discouraged (emphasis in the original). Instead, we ask people to put edits through peer review prior to them being published. For existing articles, that means proposing content on the article Talk page, and for new articles, this means putting them through WP:AFC, in each case with disclosure. This is very analogous to standard academic publishing, where COI is disclosed when a paper is submitted, and it is peer reviewed with the COI in mind, before it publishes.

I will review your processes to better follow them in the future./b

Your userpage is a bit of an oddity, in that you talk about yourself in the third person, like it is an article. Per WP:USERPAGE, userpages are not articles, but rather a place where we communicate to each other what we do here. I think it is great that you have a link to your external website there (some may view that as an advertisement, but i think paid editors should link their external WP advertising to their user profiles here, for a bunch of reasons), but it would be more.. appropriate if you changed the "he" to "I" and "his" to "my", etc.

Noted.

But the most important things are 1 and 2.. would you please reply on those?

I haven't looked at the content or the AfD yet, and will do once we are done going over this stuff. First things first! Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 18:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bartacus1704. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caren Cooper has been accepted

Caren Cooper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 23:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]