User talk:Barry Jefferson

Hi, please talk to me. :(! Barry Jefferson (talk) 15:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Hyposmocoma mediocris has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jusdafax 16:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barry Jefferson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked unfairly from wikipedia. First of all, you will notice that I have only made constructive edits. Larry Jefferson is my friend who I never suspected of being a vandal, but that does not bother me. I am NOT the same person. Barry Jefferson is my account that only I have access to, and I can assure you I will NOT vandalise Wikipedia. If you check my IP you (should) find that Barry Jefferson is the only account associated with it, although Larry has been on my computer a few times, as well as others. Wikipedia has done a lot for me in the past, and I would NEVER put false information on it. If I wanted to make amusing articles about things pretending to be serious, I would use uncyclopedia, for the reason above. Or maybe Sandbox. Thanks, Barry Jefferson.

Decline reason:

No. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Excuse me? "No" isn't a reason at all. I'm really annoyed that I've been blocked, and submitted a block request for a reason, so for you to just go "No" is extremely rude! Fair enough if you have a valid reason, but unless you do I wish to be unblocked, so I'm submitting this request again. My reason is still shown above on my talk page. (If it isn't, let me know!) Barry Jefferson (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC) No reason was necessary; you're an obvious sockpuppet and vandal, but you know both of those things already, and don't need me to tell you. The unblock template is for users who may have been incorrectly blocked to request the attention of an administrator to the error; continuing to waste admin time with it will likely result in the disabling of your talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:18, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barry Jefferson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Excuse me? "No" isn't a reason at all. I'm really annoyed that I've been blocked, and submitted a block request for a reason, so for you to just go "No" is extremely rude! Fair enough if you have a valid reason, but unless you do I wish to be unblocked, so I'm submitting this request again. My reason is still shown above on my talk page. (If it isn't, let me know!) Barry Jefferson (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No unblock reason given. Smashville^talk 18:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.