User talk:Barrabhoy

Attack

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by Hu (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Barrabhoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Hu 19:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Father Flash

I did not delete the article. I tagged it for deletion because 1) the article did not properly assert notability (there are many accused priests), 2) the article did not provide sources to back up the claims, and 3) it was written like an attack on a person. An Admin agreed and deleted the article. If you think the subject is notable, read up on how to write a proper Wikipedia article and try again. Hu 19:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Movement of United Kingdom Parliamentary expenses scandal.

I have undone your movement of United Kingdom Parliamentary expenses scandal, which removed the year from the title. This is because of a long discussion on the talk page in which consensus was reached to use the current title. Also consensus was reached not to include the year. Please see the talk page for the discussion. Martin451 (talk) 00:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to British National Party. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Rodhull andemu 20:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]