User talk:BaronJuJu

Regarding edits made during March 13 2007

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 19:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The guy is on a blatant smear campaign in which he brags about on other forums. Take a look at the SOE, SWG and John Smedley pages and see the comments from others there. He is on nothing more than a vendetta. I apologize for deleteing it, but I did edit it after it was reposted to take out the personal attacks. BaronJuJu 19:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SWG Attacks

Report it to an administrator. Antman -- chat 07:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How? I did a Admin Vandalism report on him yesterday but he is still on spamming the crap out of the page. Is there another avenue to take? BaronJuJu 17:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may find this helpful: WP:RAA. Lists the possible admin questions you may have. Hope one of them proves appropriate. -- GJD 17:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reference. That helped immensely and bookmarked for future reference.BaronJuJu 22:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SWG edits

Apologies if I caused any conflicting edits. I was merely drawn to the issue as I've had to deal with Jonawiki (talk · contribs) and Magonaritus (talk · contribs) inserting POV and highly baised edits at Upper Canada College, and noted "they"'re doing the same at SWG. I'm just trying to remove a lot of the speculation and editorialising, as well as putting the cites into a proper format. --G2bambino 17:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, no apologies needed. It's completely understandable with those two. You can delete thoses edits I made. I thought they were staying in. I am all for removing that garbage.BaronJuJu 17:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]