User talk:Barny-the-barnicle

December 2008

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:WebHamster may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. WebHamster 23:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add defamatory content once again, as you did to User talk:86.146.197.193, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WebHamster 23:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IT matters not that you and your repugnant pedophile ring succeed in blocking me as we have already succeeded in blocking Wikipedia from 95% of the UK. Work continues to extend this censorship across the US and we will succeed. The net is closing in. You have been warned.Barny-the-barnicle (talk) 23:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:86.146.197.193, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. WebHamster 23:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Antandrus, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. WebHamster 23:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots of this page have already been taken so deleting it will not assist your defenceBarny-the-barnicle (talk) 23:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 23:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Think of the children!

If it's the welfare of children you are interested in protecting, I suggest giving some money to a charity to feed the millions of them who are starving. There's some genocides I could tell you about as well. Let me know if you are interested in expanding your scope of "I am so offended" beyond images of healthy human bodies; images of suffering and death and starving children just may accomplish a more significant expansion of your moral universe. Let me know. Antandrus (talk) 01:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning barny 86.146.197.193 (talk) 10:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/86.146.197.193 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WebHamster 15:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]