User talk:Barniecadd
Welcome
[edit]
|
Discuss on the Elton Mayo talk page the proposed changes. That is what Bromley86 and I did. Don't just ram them in there. Iss246 (talk) 01:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Elton Mayo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 04:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Each article has a talk page associated with it; in this case, the title is Talk:Elton Mayo. Discussion takes place by the editors adding messages to that page and signing their messages with four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each message. The goal of discussion is to reach a consensus among editors on what should appear in the article. Until consensus is reached, the article can stay at the status quo content—in this case, as the page appeared before you made your changes. —C.Fred (talk) 04:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you C.Fred. Iss246 (talk) 05:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Barniecadd, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Barniecadd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
February 2015
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 02:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Sounds fair to me. apologies.Barniecadd (talk) 00:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
3RR reminder
[edit]Please remember that the three revert rule is a brightline rule. This edit was a violation of 3RR. I would hate to see you get blocked and/or the page protected because of this edit war; please discuss the matter at the talk page, but do not edit war over conjunctions further. —C.Fred (talk) 14:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thank you for the warning.Barniecadd (talk) 20:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for also warning the other person iss246 as well. I have left a suggestion on the elton mayo talk page for a possible resolution but am still waiting for their response.Barniecadd (talk) 03:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Barniecadd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)