User talk:Barney1995

Hello folks. All content on this talk page can be found in the edit history. If you wish, you can search the page history.

😸 Barney1995 (talk) 20:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Buses route 406, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bentall Centre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ollie Garrod

The article Ollie Garrod has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ollie Garrod. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well give me 10 minutes and I will find the source. How uncivil of you to put warnings like this yet again on my talk page (without being an admin). Stop it. Barney1995

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barney1995 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. Yes I am the said account. But I am here to edit constructively. Please let me return to editing Barney1995 (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Note that any user may issue warnings, not just admins. We don't unblock sock accounts, please return to your original account and request unblock there. 331dot (talk) 08:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.