User talk:Barefootguru

I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented.

If I post on your talk page, I will notice any replies posted there (within a few days).
Unless you request otherwise, I will reply here to comments made here.

[Kid’s pics]

Hello!

Thanks, those are great kids pictures, just the kind of thing I want. I especially like picture5, although picture4 is very interesting, with the head, but the mouth placed on the body. Picture6 is also good, it shows organized scribbling, and it is interesting how he has named these as "fish". I sure could use any of these, but if I had to choose one I like picture5. I'd be more than happy to help you with uploading, or anything else, just ask.Zeimusu | (Talk page) July 5, 2005 14:29 (UTC)

By the way, if you want to sign your name like I just did you can use the ~~~~ code. It's used on talk pages a lot.

Thanks Zeimusu | (Talk page) 11:31, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

Sybian article

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed you commented on the edit summay by saying "Spelling, typos, grammar. How did I end up here?!" Well, no matter how you found it, thanks for working on the article. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 5 July 2005 19:36 (UTC)

Most common name policy

Sorry for not responding to your question - I only visit that page occasionally. Unfortunately, it seems that there isn't any single page which contains the policy in question — it's split between several different pages. The most direct treatment of the convention is Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English), but there are also relevant sections in the Manual of Style (and its various subpages). None of the guidelines cover the entire topic in one go, however, so on reflection, I don't think a policy page is the best place to raise the issue. I would actually suggest raising it at the Village pump policy section, which would give us an outside view. (In fact, a lot of it has been gone over before, I think. Someone will probably be able to give you some better citations than I can.) -- Vardion 21:34, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vardion, will raise there and report back. Barefootguru 08:34, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

iTunes external link

You recently commented on the issue concerning the external link on the iTunes article. However, I was hoping you would weigh in here. You are already aware of the controversy concerning the issue, but I was hoping the external article might be considered on its merits, not on suspicions of my motivations. Again, your comment/vote would be appreciated. Thanks. Uriah923 15:25, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Uriah923, you come across as a rational and level-headed person, but I'm beginning to see you're obsessed with OmniNerd.

You have been repeatedly told not to create any more links to OmniNerd, yet even on the above posting you linked the article yet again (subsequently removed by Taxman).

I still think the OmniNerd iTunes article has merits, and should normally qualify for an external link. I found it well researched and a fascinating read. Unfortunately because of your SEO campaign this is not going to happen. i.e. Because of your past actions, OmniNerd articles can no longer be considered on a case-by-case basis—a blanket ruling has been made against them.

I've already stated my views in the original discussion, and I'm not going to repeat them for the follow up you started.

Barefootguru 20:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Hi. When listing a vandalism on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism please check the conditions listed at the top of the page. The user you added has not edited since yesterday and does not appear to have edited since his last warning. The vandalism you referenced was done prior to his last warning. Since he has not returned and the IP may be shared we cannot block him at this time. - Tεx τ urε 18:05, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. His last warning was 21:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC). Mac 128K was emptied 2005-12-14 09:37:25 — from my calcs that’s after the warning and within the last 24 hours… Barefootguru 18:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the merge to List of applications supporting OpenDocument

Hi, thanks for the merge, good job. I have redirect ODT (Computing) to OpenDocument as there were not much material there --Khalid hassani 14:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ☺ Barefootguru 18:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption of ODF in Massachusetts

Hi, you have deleted the context part in Adoption of ODF in Massachusetts. In Wikipedia each Article must be self containing, people are note supposed to have read OpenDocument before coming to Adoption of ODF in Massachusetts, so they must know what is this ODF thing, who promote it, what is the orgnanization body who developed it and so on. So I have reverted to to document to your Revision as of 18:05, 27 December 2005 --Khalid hassani 16:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for dropping a note here, though I think you mean Microsoft position on OpenDocument support. I’m not convinced as this is really a sub-page of OD—I think people are unlikely to go there unless they know who Microsoft is and what OD is. Still, happy for the paras to be restored, though think you should rephrase the intro so it starts by summarising the article subject: there’s now 3 paras of background on OD followed by only 1 on what the article’s actually about.

Please don’t do blanket reverts because you don’t like one change—I’m annoyed because there was other work in there too which I now have to redo. Barefootguru 20:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

email vs. e-mail

FYI: Despite your cheerfully optomistic Edit Summary in Honeypot, there is no "standardized spelling" of email (or e-mail or Email). The word remains too new for consensus to have been reached. I left your change, but I'll bet lots of people would roll it back because they think the other version is "right". - DavidWBrooks 21:39, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I guess ‘internally consistant’ would have been a better description. Category:E-mail was a mess of inconsistency, which is how I ended up at Honeypot.

The more major wp articles have e-mail, as do most dictionaries, which is consistent with g-sting, i-beam, x-ray, etc.

Thanks for the polite feedback, I’ve been waiting for the fallout after being bold ;-) Barefootguru 22:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

iTunes links

What is your reasoning for editing out the links on iTunes? I hope you are not acting on an outdated issue (the one we discussed previously on the iTunes talk page). At that time, there was a blanket decision made against links to articles published on OmniNerd, but since that time things have been resolved. First, I have agreed to not add any links to the site, as I am an administrator there. Second, I have shown that I am dedicated to WP (see my contributions).

If you look at the links that exist, all have been reviewed and added by WP administrators. Additionally, Taxman (the administrator "in charge" of the previous issue) has observed one such case of an OmniNerd link and has left it alone because of the reasons I listed here (see Talk:Conventional_warfare).

I have been playing by the rules and have made a lot of contributions to Wikipedia. Any links have been added by long standing users of good reputation. There is, most definitely, nothing "spam-like" about anything going on. I ask that you reconsider the removal of the iTunes references, given the information brought to light here. uriah923^(talk) 03:38, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again uriah923 ;-) To expand on what I put in the page history: when I edited the article (for another change), Wikipedia said it wouldn’t allow the page due to OmniNerd links—they were on a spam block list. Personally I have no problems with the link I commented out or the one which was already commented out. I had quite a job even preserving them within comments, but feel free to try and get them reinstated. If you don’t have the time/inclination either I’m happy to post a message on the talk page for someone to take up the cause. Barefootguru 04:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will take up the cause, but I'm not sure how this whole things works. It appears that someone has added "omninerd.com" to a blacklist here, and I assume that is the problem. I suggest we move the conversation to the iTunes talk page so you, Mushroom and I can work together. Please come comment there. uriah923^(talk) 05:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Essjay updated his info. Please see my comment on the iTunes talk page and the blacklist talk page. uriah923^(talk) 02:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The blacklisting was removed. Thanks for your help and comments. uriah923^(talk) 07:10, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland meetup

Just to let you know that a meetup is planned in Auckland for the 25th of June (see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland for more details), and that you are cordially invited. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 00:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I’m Wellington based. Barefootguru 07:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SAS 8 on IBM Mainframe.png

Hello, Barefootguru. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:SAS 8 on IBM Mainframe.png) was found at the following location: User:Barefootguru. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Caesar III on Apple Mac.png

Hello, Barefootguru. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Caesar III on Apple Mac.png) was found at the following location: User:Barefootguru. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SAS 9 on Microsoft Windows.png

Hello Barefootguru, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:SAS 9 on Microsoft Windows.png) was found at the following location: User:Barefootguru. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SAS 9 on Microsoft Windows.png

Thanks for uploading Image:SAS 9 on Microsoft Windows.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AUK

This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifar ious1 09:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Caesar_III_on_Apple_Mac.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Caesar_III_on_Apple_Mac.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 09:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:McGillicuddy Highland Army vs. Alf's Imperial Army in Hamilton, 1989-03.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:McGillicuddy Highland Army vs. Alf's Imperial Army in Hamilton, 1989-03.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 03:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:McGillicuddy Highland Army vs. Alf's Imperial Army in Hamilton, 1989-03.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:McGillicuddy Highland Army vs. Alf's Imperial Army in Hamilton, 1989-03.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient history

I question some of the claims in this edit [1]. The 3084 and 3090-400 were anything but two machines in a single frame. Both could be run either in single-image (SI) mode, or partitioned (PP) mode. This was true of other machines in the 3090 range, of course - IBM's definition of a multi-processor was a machine that could be partitioned in this way. In the case of the 3084, certainly, there was a performance hit compared with two 3081s, because each pair of processors had only one path to memory not two. When some other company offered a service of splitting up a 3084 into two separate machines, IBM sued, on the grounds of breach of copyright of the microcode. What is your source for your claims?

I propose to fix these errors in a few days, but given they've been up so long I thought I'd give you the opportunity to reply first. Philip Trueman (talk) 14:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Philip, those configs were from notes I took from a system programmer when we were working on them, cool if you have a more authoritative source.

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:E-mail

Category:E-mail, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SAS 8 on IBM Mainframe3.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SAS 8 on IBM Mainframe3.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Barefootguru. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Barefootguru. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Barefootguru. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SAS 9 on Microsoft Windows.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SAS 9 on Microsoft Windows.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]