User talk:Barbarabloemink/sandbox
Appearance
Theatrical designs
[edit]The article makes no mention of the designs for Orphée of the Quat-z-arts. Can we add a section about Stettheimer's theatrical designs? Vexations (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- I un-commented the relevant section Vexations (talk) 22:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Sources from extant article
[edit]These are sources that are in use in the current version of Florine Stettheimer that have not been used in this new draft version. I have linked to the citation and the supporting source:
- Florine_Stettheimer#cite_ref-6 https://venetianred.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/florine-stettheimer-occasionally-a-human-being-saw-my-light/
- This source use bloemink, so just use her instead
- Brittannica relies on flawed secondary sources, do not use
- Florine_Stettheimer#cite_ref-11 http://brbl-archive.library.yale.edu/exhibitions/cvvpw/gallery/stetthe1.html
- Has photos od Carrie and Ettie, would be a pity not to use
- review of a book we use as a source, so use that instead
- Tertiary. Uses sources we already have
- Florine_Stettheimer#cite_ref-16 https://www.newcriterion.com/issues/1995/9/aoeflorine-stettheimer-manhattan-fantasticaa
- Problematic, make calim that Stettheir wanted her work distroyed. Do not use.
- Points to a primary source. Should be listed
- Done
- Florine_Stettheimer#cite_ref-20 https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/24/nyregion/art-a-rogues-gallery-of-artists-and-esthetes.html
- Problematic. Claims about contributions to dollhouse.
- Florine_Stettheimer#cite_ref-Mulcahy_25-0 http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/columns/intelligencer/11473/
- Not sure. Perhaps use in Legacy?
- Florine_Stettheimer#cite_ref-28 https://brooklynrail.org/2012/03/artseen/florine-stettheimer-hieroglyphs-of-pleasure
- Not necessary; we have the MET iself as a source.
- Florine_Stettheimer#cite_ref-30 https://books.google.se/books?id=j7IPCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA115&dq=Parker+Tyler+stettheimer&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjN6ozc2pfgAhVqx4sKHcsIBcYQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Parker%20Tyler%20stettheimer&f=false
- Helpfully clarifies that Tyler is not a reliable source, but Bloemink is. Perhaps use?
- Barbarabloemink, what do you think?