User talk:Barat Venkit

Welcome!

Hello, Barat Venkit, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Barat Venkit, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Pahunkat (talk) 10:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Barat Venkit

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Barat Venkit. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pahunkat (talk) 10:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... This prediction is related to the entire world. In the present time of Corona pandemic, this article gives more insights into how to save oneself, precautions, remedies etc. This article could save millions of lives and the planet Earth itself. Barat Venkit (talk) 11:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Deleting this article would be the biggest mistake you have ever done in your life. --Barat Venkit (talk) 11:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"People who have taken new Corona virus vaccination" will be the most affected seems a bit hoaxy to me. Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. Pahunkat (talk) 11:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's userpage guidelines. Your userpage is not an encyclopedia article. It is a special page for you to write a small amount about yourself, and your goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Prediction of the deadliest pandemic attack of the world

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Prediction of the deadliest pandemic attack of the world. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 18:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barat Venkit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This prediction is not made just like that. You may go through the links mentioned in the article for authenticity. This is the rarest knowledge on Earth. Many may get benefitted by reading this article and may prepare themselves for the upcoming new pandemic. So I request the reviewers of the Wikipedia to not to waste any more time and approve it and thereby save humanity at large. Barat Venkit (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 09:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.