User talk:Bang bang you're dead

Fucking great Liam Gallagher pic, mate. It really complaments the article. I dunno what sort of access you have to them, but any chance you could get a pic or two from the early-mid 90s or the late 90s? It's a bit sparse at the moment. Cheers.--Crestville 15:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately we can't use it unless you can get Andrew Kendall to release it without a non commercial clause (see Wikipedia_talk:Fair_use#Why_do_we_not_accept_non_commercial_clauses.3F). Arniep 10:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the problem here. He took the photos, gave his permission to use on this website. Bang Bang you're dead

It's a nasty complex system they have. The new pictures they're using are crap though--Crestville 01:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the problem is anything on Wikipedia isn't just being used here it is also used on commercial mirrors like Answers.com. If you can get him to license the photo without a non commercial clause we can use it. Arniep 01:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since when has this been in affect? That's just stupid. Bang Bang you're dead

since this is an issue of who can use it and who can't for distribution, couldn't I just put what he has clearly stated in his website about using the photographs? Bang Bang you're dead

He probably doesn't realise Wikipedia has commercial mirrors. He may well agree to release just that particular photo under a free license if you ask. Arniep 01:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note he specifically states on his website that he only releases the photos under a non commercial license. Arniep 01:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

getting to that, but avoiding it. Making things difficult now. Bang Bang you're dead

Do you want to email him or shall I do it? Arniep 01:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that, yes. I'm not simple. Anyways, If you have time mate go right ahead, If not then I'll find time later. Bang Bang you're dead

Hi, I just emailed him. Professional photographers like that are less likely to agree to release their images than fans (who aren't likely to make any money out of their pics anyway). Arniep 01:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Loveing Oscar Wilde

You realise this can never be.

For me though, maybe.--Crestville 00:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh but I can always dream. -- Bang Bang you're dead 00:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True that sister.--Crestville 00:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Albums

Boo Libertines, Yay everything else (except maybe MSP)--Crestville 17:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boo Libertines? How dare! and the holy Bible is class..but I see your opinion. Bang Bang you're dead 17:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

I removed Category:User templates as your userpage is not a template and I'm going to guess it was added erroneously. The other thing I did was remove the gallery tags, as fair use images (such as album covers) may not be used on anything other than articles, and even then only in certain conditions. Please read Wikipedia:Fair use. Kotepho 00:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh Sod off.

I'm sorry that you wish I would leave you alone, but copyright issues are non-negotiable. Kotepho 00:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to change something, one) Notify me and two) Don't leave it looking like complete shite. Bang Bang you're dead

Better looking now? Also, Image:O- LIAM-RICK2 copy.png and Image:O- LIAM-RICK2 copy.JPG have no source or licensing information. The {{PD-self}} tag on Image:RIDE070292c.jpg is questionable, considering you say it is used with permission and list a source. With permission images fall under the same use conditions as fair use images, and images that would not qualify as fair use will be deleted [1]. Kotepho 01:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'll fix it. Now nazi over to someone else. Bang Bang you're dead 20:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know you mean well, but your crusin' for a brusin'. You should have just asked her to do it herself--Crestville 20:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's like, fuckin hell at least leave a little message first before you piss all over my page. Bang Bang you're dead 20:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Info boxes for magazines

I notice that you have added a number of info boxes for magazines and in almost every case you use a magazine cover to illustrate the box. By current fair use definition, this does not seem to qualify as fair use, but is only decoration. Interested in your interpretation on this. Doc 22:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It does say in the copyright that it is ok to use a Magazine cover if it is used in direct example of the magazine itself, for the page. Which is exactly what I have done. Bang Bang you're Dead

I'll check that one out. It's not that I disagree with what you have done, but I've been getting a lot of controversy over magazine covers of late and wanted your input Thanks, Doc 13:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I understand. I have yet to see any proof on this though. I have no problem with changing things to logos if this issue turns up true. User:Bang bang you're dead

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Qlogo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Qlogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They had it coming

it was announced that he was in negotiations with the makers of Channel 4 afternoon quiz Countdown to appear as the weekly celebrity guest in "Dictionary Corner". Co-presenter Carol Vorderman, interviewed by The Daily Sport, said, "Liam loves it and yes, we're in talks about him coming on. I told him I think it will do his cred no end of good."

Proof, if ever it was needed, that there is a God. But my oh my does he work in mysterious ways.--Crestville 18:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, That was brilliant. Gave a bit of finger clackin' there. Hmmm. -- Bang Bang You're Dead 22:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to mention it's Liam bloody Gallagher, but I see you guessed. I can't wait for that.--Crestville 11:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Noll341.png

An image that you uploaded, Image:Noll341.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 20:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The author giving it to you doesn't mean they intend to release it under a free license. Another, un-free license would not help as it would be considered replaceable fair use then. Wikipedia wants free images. --MECU≈talk 21:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't. But the burden of proof is upon you, the uploader, to prove the owner wanted this to keep this image. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for some help. --MECU≈talk 21:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Killamangiro .jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Killamangiro .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Albaseventeen.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Albaseventeen.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:706569875_l.jpg

I have tagged Image:706569875_l.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 12:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:0530-12.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:0530-12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Callinalllostlas.jpg

I have tagged Image:Callinalllostlas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 21:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Breaklooselostlas.jpg

I have tagged Image:Breaklooselostlas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 21:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thelasinfever_.jpg

I have tagged Image:Thelasinfever_.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 21:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Breaklooselostlas.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Breaklooselostlas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Callinalllostlas.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Callinalllostlas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Thelasinfever .jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thelasinfever .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dude, I saw you uploaded some pics of Noel Gallagher, I also uploaded a very cool pic of him, but it was removed by wikipedia. It should be the licence problem. I don't know how to get the Creative Commons Licence or any other licence for it. I was wondering how you got the licence for your pics so that I keep my pictures from getting removed?

Live Forever Dude

-Another Dude

Image source problem with Image:84 NME Awards logo L300106.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:84 NME Awards logo L300106.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 18:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:706569875_l.jpg

I have tagged Image:706569875_l.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 02:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Normal_gq-covers-002.jpg

I have tagged Image:Normal_gq-covers-002.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marie-claire-4-06.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Marie-claire-4-06.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Garageflower .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Garageflower .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mojo cover.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mojo cover.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:UJ233433.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:UJ233433.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VogueKate2003.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VogueKate2003.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:VogueKate2003.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VogueKate2003.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ThestonerosesRemixes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ThestonerosesRemixes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The very best of .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The very best of .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Albionarge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Albionarge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OX4 .jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:OX4 .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DBOASISshotPRESS sm.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DBOASISshotPRESS sm.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 07:49, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:68782459 760c3d444a.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:68782459 760c3d444a.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --PleaseStand ^(talk) 04:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ZImage1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ZImage1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Fforvever .jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fforvever .jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:WikiLiam.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:WikiLiam.PNG, which you've sourced to http://www.flickr.com/photos/fakeplastiktree/68782460/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 09:46, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:84 nmecoverpetedoherty L250706.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:84 nmecoverpetedoherty L250706.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:RIDEb022.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RIDEb022.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.ticket2ride.it/imgs/picgal/press/html/b022.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 03:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RIDE070292c.jpg

The file File:RIDE070292c.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Oscar212.JPG

The file File:Oscar212.JPG has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]