User talk:Banclark70

Welcome!

Hello, Banclark70, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page United Nations Security Council resolution have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Your recent edit to 1996 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brandy & Mr. Whiskers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brandy & Mr. Whiskers was changed by Banclark70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.991076 on 2014-09-11T12:26:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kalikatar with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 12:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pearlie, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Pearlie was changed by Banclark70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941908 on 2014-09-11T13:11:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]