User talk:Banclark58

August 2014

Hello, I'm Lartoven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to 900 (number), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lartoven (t·c) 06:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 49 (number) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. lartoven (t·c) 06:39, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 153 (number) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. lartoven (t·c) 06:39, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Low (David Bowie album). Jim1138 (talk) 06:45, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]