User talk:Bananabread7
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]
|
bread with coffee Grilledrex (talk) 19:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Bananabread7, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]
|
Peer Review |
| Hi! I took a look at our group's peer review, and I'll be peer reviewing Greysweater and Bryochemist's pages. Let me know if that is an issue! Geochem8 (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC) |
Peer Review
[edit]Hi, BananaBread7
Your edits have been focused on the introduction so I will focus there. I think that you have added more information however it is somewhat confusing. I think that some effort should be made in explaining what a normative use of decision theory is or removing some of the jargon to make it easier to understand. Similarly, I'd recommend both linking to the cancelation rule page on wikipedia if it exists and explaining shortly what it is for the last sentence in the paragraph. I'd also recommend finding additional sources for the article as currently there is only one source referenced. This should also help you in expanding the article. Adding an example of the multi stage decision making that you mention in the introduction into the example section would also seem appropriate. If you have further updates to the article and wish further feedback send me a message.
Greysweater (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Dear Bananabread7,
What you have so far is written well but I think that you should add more background to the page. I am not familiar with Prospect Theory- I think that a description of how pseudocertainty effect fits into the larger body of work will add clarity and context to your page. As well, I think that this is missing any information regarding the significance of the pseudocertainty effect. If you added more text about the founding of the pseudocertainty effect and it's history I think this would add a lot of value to the page. For example, adding information about who proposed or advanced the theory or idea behind this would be an easy add in and might also make it easier to transition to talking about any potential significance behind the pseudocertainty effect. I hope that helps and if you have any questions feel free to ask me.
(Bryochemist (talk) 00:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC))
Bryochemist (talk) 00:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)