User talk:Bamrsykp

Topic proposal

Please propose a topic or two that you wish to write on Wikipedia. You should read all related articles/policies on Wikipedia and provide the following information.

1. Your proposed article(s) (New or existing STUB article relating to a chemical compound, reaction, equipment or technique - or related to your major/interest. (see Category:Stub-Class Chemistry articles))
   • For new article, explain briefly why it passes WP:NOTE.
   • For existing topics, explain briefly the state/structure of the current article.
     • Is the structure & existing content appropriate?
       • If not, restructure or remove content as per WP:MOS and WP:NOT before you move to the next stage.
2. Brief outline of your contributions to the article
   • In what section & what content
     • Make sure it belongs to the article and it is encyclopedic. See WP:NOT for things that should NOT be added.
     • Make sure that it is not redundant to existing articles. Use Google search "site:wikipedia.org" rather than Wikipedia search.
   • References for the article
   • Media files (photo/VDO/drawing) to be used in the article.
     • You may suggest plan to create your own work and upload to Wikimedia Commons
     • You may use existing media on Wikimedia Commons. Use Google image search "site:wikimedia.org" rather than Wikimedia Commons search.
3. Examples/template/related articles that you will use as a model to develop your nominated article.
   • In terms of WP:MOS/formatting - your article will have similar style/format/tone to these articles.
   • In terms of content - your article will link to or will be linked from these articles.

Please leave your answer below. (Leave a reply in this section of your talkpage.) --Taweetham (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

This is a reminder that you have not complete the assignment. Please complete it as soon as possible to remain in our program. --Taweetham (talk) 05:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your topic, Chemical storage is now approved. See further instructions below. --Taweetham (talk) 06:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

First draft

Your topic is approved and added to the course page. Please develop the proposal into the first draft in your sandbox.

• For existing article, you may copy some parts of the existing article to your sandbox to see how revision/integration of content would work. You will copy the code back to the article at later stage.
• For new article, you may want to copy parts of a template article to your sandbox to see what sections are necessary. The sandbox will be moved to the article namespace at later stage. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.

In all cases, do not copy more than what is necessary. For example, do not copy any categories to your sandbox. --Taweetham (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

First edit on the article namespace

Your work has been reviewed. Majority of the content/formatting is ok. Please carefully move encyclopedic part of your sandbox to article namespace so that the general public can see it. Here are some tips to help you complete the transition to online editing.

1. Content/Formatting policies
   • For the purpose of this assignment, do NOT copy anything from anywhere to Wikipedia and it sister projects. You must create all of the content primarily by yourself with assistance/supervision of the instructor & the team. The content, however, must be encyclopedic & relevant and supported by reliable references.
   • The content must be in the right format and added to the right place of the article.
   • You can learn writing and formatting style from similar (but better class) articles on Wikipedia. You can find them from links/categories of your article. Learning from good examples is perhaps the best short-cut to your success.
2. Technicalities
   • Unlike sandbox, all edits will be public immediately and it is important to make sure that all of your edits are acceptable. You may use preview button and provide edit summary to help you.
   • Any "page save" on Wikipedia even outside article namespace is permanently recorded and can be retrieved by the public. Please think carefully before you click save and before you revert other people edits. No work is lost but only the latest version of the page is shown to the public. Deletion of pages (or versions of pages) is only possible by admins if it falls under Wikipedia:Deletion policy. You can request admins to do deletion or other prescribed tasks should the need arises.
   • You may want to set watchlist and notifications so that you can catch up with changes made to your article and your talk page by other editors.
3. Community interactions
   • You will be interacting with other volunteers when you make edits on the article namespace. Please respect other users in the community and assume good faith.
   • If your work is reverted or modified in any other ways, do not engage in a edit war. Rather use discussion page of your article to settle issues.
   • You may be blocked from Wikipedia for failure to observe community rules.

We hope you enjoy seeing product of your hard work read by many people in the years to come. --Taweetham (talk) 23:52, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi from your reviewer

Hello Bamrsykp, welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to be your reviewer for the ICCH224 course. Please feel free to contact me via my talk page if you have any questions about anything. Cheers, --Pilarbini (talk) 06:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments for chemical storage article

Hello Bamrsykp,

Thanks for your contribution in chemical storage article. Here are some suggestions.

General comments: Lead section is well written especially in emphasising the topic importance, but need be polished especially with grammar. The article still lacks wikilinks. Overall, please reread and check grammar for the whole article, look for errors in spacing, punctuation, capitalization, and subject-verb agreement.

Specific comments:

• "Therefore, the chemical laboratory must be stored properly to prevent any prior accident." — subsequent accidents?

• Captitalize only the first letter in section heading
• Note that the introduction section is included in the leading section (as removed by taweetham (talk · contribs))
• Principles of chemical storage section
  • Rephrase “Labeling, every chemical need to label” and please check your grammar
  • “Do not store chemical alphabetically”— why not? Any exceptions? Cite?)
  • “and must be categorized which based on their degree” — more like Chemical Storage Group instead of degree?
  • "Minimize quantities, stored a chemical in an appropriate amount." — appropriate according to what?
  • "Avoid a chemicals from being in contact to heat or direct sunlight. (This may deteriorate the chemical container as well as the degradation of the chemicals"— please rephrase or check grammar
  • "Maintaining a proper condition of chemical storage areas." — elaborate what does a proper condition means?
• "Types of chemical storage" section— the heading is somewhat misleading, might be better to add "facility"
  • "frequently used chemical storage;" — change ; to .
  • For each items listed, consider having the first sentence that explains the distinct characteristic of that type.
  • "Shelving ..." — describe and give reason of using this type of storage facility, now the content seemed to be more suitable in Guidelines section
  • "Cabinets, there are various types of cabinets..." — change to something like "Cabinets exist in various types, which is made up of different materials serving different function." before further describing each type
• Maintenance section
  • any sources? if this section is too short, it can be merged with guidelines.

Hope you find this useful, feel free to contact me if you have further questions. --Pilarbini (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion :D่ --Bamrsykp (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

---

Thanks for your contribution to the article.

1. Please carefully read WP:NOT and make sure that your article has an encyclopedic tone.
2. References should be added to support your text and should be properly formatted by the templates, {{cite web}} or {{cite journal}}.

Please have a look at similar articles on Wikipedia e.g. Storage of cultural heritage objects and learn from the example. --Taweetham (talk) 01:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

---

It is important to read before you write. Please learn how to use Help:Page_history to appreciate the work of other editors before you contribute to the article. If there are any disagreements, it is important to discuss/resolve issues/conflicts on discussion/talk pages. If you do not understand or need help, our student volunteers are ready to help. (@Pilarbini and Athikhun.suw:) --Taweetham (talk) 04:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Chemical storage. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 14:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chemical storage. DMacks (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Chemical storage

I saw your edits to the chemical storage article. You have improved it quite a bit; it was in a sorry state before you started editing it. Thanks for that! I also noticed, however, that your more recent edits were often considered problematic and were either heavily modified by others or reverted outright. I must agree with DMacks that edits such as this or this are problematic: The latter includes broken references (did you copy-paste that from elsewhere?), the grammar is problematic, it reads in part like a how-to guide (something Wikipedia is not), and at least in part the advice even seems rather dubious (sodium chloride, ie salt, should be "double contained"? I don't think that's how it's commonly stored, certainly not in my kitchen). At this point it may be best to start a discussion on the article's talk page regarding what further improvement is needed and what references should be used. Huon (talk) 00:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Meetup

You are invited to the meet up. --Taweetham (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)