User talk:Bambishambi

October 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to User:Orangemike, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User:Orangemike, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will not accept your threat. I posted a truth with a source. Why should it not be revealed that a female felt harassed by an admin user at Wikipedia if there are sources of evidence? If my edits are not accepted and you continue to threaten me then I see no other choice than demonstrating that I will not allow you to abuse your admin. power. If you, Orangemike, Materialscientist and other admins do not stop abusing your admin power and don't accept my (and other people's) edits then it may happen that Wikipedia articles may be deleted indiscriminately or that there may happen a DDOS standstill on Wikipedia.

None of the above are Admins. That was simply about a person adding unsourced material to their autobiography. Nothing to do with her being female, nothing to do with anyone being an Admin. A lot of editors would have done the same thing. Interestingly the material was added by an IP from London as their only edit, with the source being Johnson herself. I don't know about you, but I don't like the idea of degrees or anything like that being sourced to the person who says they have them, I prefer independent sources. But if I go and remove that, will I end up with my name in the paper for trying to get an article to meet our policy WP:VERIFY? The only person that I see harassed is Orange Mike, harassed for trying to enforce policy. Dougweller (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dougweller, as you are not involved: Keep your beak out of the issue. "A lot of other editors would have done the same"... How do you know? Can you scientifically prove this? No, you can't. This woman obviously felt harassed by Orangemike. Full stop. Recently, other edits were blocked as well, especially in the section of education in the united kingdom. As said before, I do not accept any threats and abuse of admin power, or abuse of power of users who may not be admins but obviously possess privileges. If you, Mendaliv, Orangemike, Materialscientist and other admins do not stop abusing your (admin) power and don't accept my (and other people's) edits then it may happen that Wikipedia articles may be deleted indiscriminately or that there may happen a (D)DOS standstill on Wikipedia.

Blocked indefinitely

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Goldarab (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 22:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]