Jump to content

User talk:Bamas100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:African Trade Insurance Agency has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:African Trade Insurance Agency. Thanks! HighKing++ 21:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I took a look and agree with the above assessment. It might be worth mentioning that making suggested improvements and notifying the editor might be positive for approval. Otr500 (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Trade Insurance Agency has been accepted

[edit]
African Trade Insurance Agency, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Un-accepted

[edit]

An article you recently created, African Trade Insurance Agency, had an improper review and is not ready to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Bamas100. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bamas100. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bamas100|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 18:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]