User talk:Ballsack78
January 2014
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Dred Scott v. Sandford has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dred Scott v. Sandford was changed by Ballsack78 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857158 on 2014-01-16T17:04:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dred Scott v. Sandford with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dred Scott v. Sandford with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 17:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster talk 17:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)