User talk:Balki Chalkidiki

Welcome!

Hello, Balki Chalkidiki! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Turkey. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 17:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ankara collage image

How can you defend this hideous Ankara collage? Have you ever looked the other capitals? Tokyo, Madrid, Rome, Paris, London... All of them concrete jungle according to you. Please give up your this idea. Thank you. Ahmet Gürsakal (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but your collage looks very ugly. You have also repeated Kızılay Square (twice) and Kocatepe Mosque (twice), with a couple of meaningless concrete buildings which I couldn't even identify (one of them is the old İş Bankası building designed by Giulio Mongeri, but it's so tiny that nobody can even notice and appreciate it.) Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 08:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Choice

All right Shuppiluliuma (yes, I know it's you, I've blocked hundred of your socks before, remember?), you have a choice to make. You can continue edit-warring, which will result in one of two things: An indef block for edit-warring like what happened to your Lord of Rivendell sock, or an indef block after I file an SPI on you if you continue to annoy me. Or, you can stay out of my way and I will pretend not to notice you are a sock and yo can go about your business. Your call. Athenean (talk) 18:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about... All I'm saying is that the CIA World Factbook (which gives a realistic figure like 18%) is a more trustable source than Sandra Mackey, M.A. (with all due respect - may she rest in peace) who claims a figure of "25%" which is neither scientific nor realistic (1 in every 4 people in Turkey is not Kurdish.) Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 10:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey infobox

Hello Balki Chalkidiki,

You changed the infobox of the article Turkey and you wrote:

"This is a discriminatory list (cherry picking) and the infobox can't contain them all. The full list of spoken languages is in the Demographics section of this article."

"Linking to the section in the infobox, so that all languages can be seen."

There are some languages which are spoken of a large number of people in Turkey, like Turkish, Kurmanji, Kabardian, Arabic and Zazaki. Other languages (such as Abaza, Abkhaz, Adyge, Cappadocian Greek, Gagauz, Hértevin, Homshetsma, Kabard-Cherkes, Ladino (Judesmo), Laz, Mlahso, Pontic Greek, Romani, Suret, Turoyo, Ubykh, and Western Armenian) are spoken of fewer people (each language less than 400,000 people) in Turkey.

For this reason, it is more useful to mention the most common spoken languages in Turkey in the infobox, and to add a link "various others" to the article "Languages of Turkey" where all spoken languages in Turkey are mention.

What is your opinion about that?

Kind regards,

Balu --Balu12345 (talk) 11:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make a list in the infobox (let's keep the current See section link in the infobox) but feel free to enrich the content of the Languages section. Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 12:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Balki Chalkidiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Turkey. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

You must have missed the RfC which closed with consensus not to include this. Stop edit-warring against WP:CONSENSUS and read: RfC: Should this article mention the "emblem of Turkey"? Dr. K. 14:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't me. I don't care too much about the "emblem" detail. Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 08:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The anonymous IP user 212.252.85.62 who did the edit-warring was someone else. I didn't do any editing in Wikipedia between December 1 and December 5. Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 08:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please add my name to the long list of editors who are concerned with your disruptive editing on the Turkey article. The discussion concerning shortcomings of Turkey's unitary administrative structure, as well as its related violation of the European Charter of Local Self-Government, are topics of major relevance and attention both within Turkey and internationally. You cannot delete that from the article just because the topic/discussion does not suit your personal POV agenda. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 16:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The European Charter of Local Self-Government (see article) of the Council of Europe (not EU) is in effect since 1988, and it doesn't give a municipality the right to declare autonomy or to secede from the central government of Turkey. All Turkish municipalities currently have their own legislative bodies, for decisions on municipal issues. Turkey is not obliged to add anything more, as you falsely claim. Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, the "European Charter of Local Self-Government" has nothing to do with the EU, and you please stop deleting important well sourced content from the article, or I will report your account. Use the article talk page instead of edit warring. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 19:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Your recent editing history at Turkey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Use the article talk page instead of edit-warring. I just opened a new section, as an invitation to you to present any issues you have -- 2A1ZA (talk) 19:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 13:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The European Charter of Local Self-Government (see article) of the Council of Europe (not EU) is in effect since 1988, and it doesn't give a municipality the right to declare autonomy or to secede from the central government of Turkey. All Turkish municipalities currently have their own legislative bodies, for decisions on municipal issues. Turkey is not obliged to add anything more, as you falsely claim. Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 14:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the sources given in the article. There is much left which Turkey is obliged to implement, contrary to your incorrect and unsourced claim to the contrary. And please stop this "declare autonomy or to secede from the central government" nonsense distraction which has nothing to do with the issue at hand, namely legal provisions for the administrative and fiscal dimension of local self-government. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Turkey

You've been warned for edit warrring at Turkey per a complaint at WP:AN3. Either of you may be blocked if you edit again about decentralization before you have got a clear consensus for your version on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you are continuing to edit about decentralization after my warning. Can you explain why you shouldn't be blocked? EdJohnston (talk) 18:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because I "re-edited" it and kept the core of the information, while correcting the mistake regarding the charter. Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you revert your last change there might still be time to avoid a block. EdJohnston (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am only defending the truth. The Council of Europe doesn't ask Turkey to grant more regional autonomy to municipalities. This is a deliberately wrong definition, with a definite purpose. Balki Chalkidiki (talk) 19:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is what the Council of Europe says. Most obviously it does ask Turkey to grant more administrative and fiscal competence/powers to local government, contrary to your claim. And please end your obsession with the term "autonomy", because it is not the accurate term here. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 12:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey edit war

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. You've been blocked because you continued to make edits about decentralization after closure of the report, contrary to my warning to both parties. EdJohnston (talk) 19:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Continued edit warring at Turkey

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 06:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I feel a perma-block is necessary here. as you can see , the user has been given multiple warnings already. he'll probably just resort to edit war after the week. -Arkhaminsanity (talk) 14:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Balki_Chalkidiki reported by User:McGeddon (Result: ). Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 11:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shuppiluliuma. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Shuppiluliuma (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]