User talk:Baldersdod

Welcome!

Hello, Baldersdod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Alexmar983 (talk) 08:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TheGuyWithGlasses Sandbox

Hi Baldersdod.

I carefully read the Manual of Style of Wikipedia as you ask us to do. I do find the layout of the proposed article to be sufficiently adherent with the requirements of Wikipedia about the layout. I have added the footnotes you have required.

Yours faithfully,

TheGuyWithGlasses

Wikpedia project

Hello Baldersdod,

We were working on the wiki projec tabout culutral neuroscience. We published our changes but our content was deleted by another user. We received this message: "You have posted text to Wikipedia which has been copied verbatim from other sources, which almost certainly infringed legal copyright, and certainly violated Wikipedia's copyright policy. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. In the very few occasions when authors release their content under such free licensing terms we require proof of the fact; we don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. Also, much of the content which you posted was clearly written to advocate a point of view, which is not permitted by Wikipedia policy, which requires content to be written from a neutral point of view. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:52, 8 May 2019 (U" .

We checked our text in an online plagiarism page and we found only a few sentences that could be problematic. However, he deleted everything from my sandbox and now we lost our article. He is saying that we are trying to advocate an opinion but we just cited scientific facts,so we find this comment not true. What can we do??

Thank you in advance

--Anastadi (talk) 14:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:VictoriaZagitova/sandbox2

Hello, Baldersdod. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 07:30, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alessio Bisutti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alessio Bisutti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessio Bisutti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gheus (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]