User talk:Balancernd

This is Balancernd's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Balancernd/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TimothyJosephWood 12:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Balancernd, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TimothyJosephWood 12:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Balancernd/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Balancernd/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Balancernd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont think I was advertising I am offering to help people at no Cost... For example I am currently in Bali training students at Udayana University to use the ANUGA model.... at no cost.... ?? I dont make any money from the ANUGA model it is free and open source

Decline reason:

You have not proposed a new username as instructed. You don't have to make any money to be promoting something. Please review conflict of interest. As you don't indicate what edits you wish to make, along with not proposing a new username, I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 03:18, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Balancernd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Rather than say it is again declined.... would be more useful to suggest what needs to be changed so as to comply... as the explanation is unclear. How can I have a conflict of interest if there is no benefit to me of sharing information, that other people benefit from ? I am happy to try to comply, if it is made clear what needs to change on the ANUGA page where you believe I have created a conflict of interest ? This has been blocked for more than 2 years ? Why do I need a new username ? I dont understand? I am just trying to help people get to know about a free and open source flood modelling program ? Ok I promise to not put advertisements on the ANUGA Hydro page... and I will Scrap the BalanceRnD Site... as I was under the impression that a business can have a Wiki Page? If I was wrong... I simply wont have one...Please delete the Site

Decline reason:

It is your responsibility to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. This unblock request shows you can't be bothered. You didn't pick a new username despite being told to do so twice. You didn't convince us you understand WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. And you didn't tell us what you'll write about instead. Yamla (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Balancernd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seems I am a very simple person... I understand the block is related to the page about Balance RnD is it not ?? I have requested / suggested that perhaps Wikipedia is the wrong forum to post information about BalanceRnD and requested/suggested the Page be deleted/removed. Hence I would have thought that would resolve the conflict of interest ? I am happy to create a new login profile... but at this stage your block does not allow me to do anything ? As I understand it until the block is lifted from the IP or whatever access has been blocked I cannot create a new profile ? The only other page I have edited it ANUGA Hydro... Which I do not think I have created any conflicts of interest ? Please confirm

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked until:

you propose a new username that meets the username policy
you confirm that this account is used by one individual only
you agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation (requested edits will still be permitted)
you agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose your paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
you indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed your request so it will display properly. To propose a new username for this account, please follow the instructions in the block notice. Agreeing to not edit about BalanceRnD is good, but we then need to know what you will edit about instead. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 07:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock| Ok I only propose to edit facts about the use of the ANUGA model and plans of its ongoing development as an open source project. }

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Balancernd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

New User name Request Rudy_VanDrie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

This is my Name

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

As you've now had five unblock requests and have refused to listen to what you are being told about WP:COI, I have revoked talk page access. If your current request is declined, that leaves you with WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]