User talk:Bajingo69

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I've blocked you per WP:NOTHERE. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Censorship!

Not only do you revert my edits and block me, but you hide my improvement to the article (as well as other people's improvements) from public view? @Anna Frodesiak:, my views, I assure you, would be shared by any respectable biologist or any other hard scientist should they be allowed to speak without the fear of public censure. This site, presumably a neutral encyclopedia, has fallen *hard* into the PC trap. You and your fellow admins need to reevaluate your priorities. Editing from the point of view of a social justice warrior is not encyclopedic. You've even prevented sensible people from editing the articles on Bradley Manning and Bruce Jenner; new accounts and IPs can't edit them at all, while established users are intimidated by the SJW clique that has taken over this site. Bajingo69 (talk) 23:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost?!

I was doing no such thing! @Anna Frodesiak: you deleted my user page because you disagreed with what I put on it, point blank. Real women have vaginas! (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

The reason I blocked you

I blocked you because you added disparaging content about a living person. It was not sourced, and even if it was, it would have to be very, very well sourced.

Imagine you were famous and had an article here. You were recently divorced. An editor called Bajingo69 added "...John Doe got divorced because he is a horrible, horrible person...", how would you feel about that? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

@Anna Frodesiak: I never said anyone was a horrible person! Mental illness is a fact of life for many people. I myself have dealt with depression my whole life. The fact of the matter is, gender dysphoria is just another mental illness. It should be dealt with through therapy and medication, not through bodily mutilation and forcing everyone else to act like fantasy is reality. I don't believe that transgenderism necessarily indicates any major moral failures---just a confused person allowing society to enable them instead of actually helping.

Also, you still haven't addressed your deletion of my user page. Real women have vaginas! (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

You know what you wrote at that article. It was clearly derogatory and that person would not like it in their article. As for your userpage, well, you are a blocked editor who has not contributed anything constructive, so why should such a statement at your userpage be allowed? It is a violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST and your personal view, as is "gender dysphoria is just another mental illness". If you want a website to host your views, there are other sites for that. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

@Anna Frodesiak: I could've used better wording, I'll admit. Your rationale for deleting my page still makes no sense. I wasn't blocked when I made it. Other editors have their various political and religious views on their pages. In some cases the wording is offensive to those with opposing viewpoints. Yet they aren't accused of using this site as a web host. You can't censor someone just because you disagree with the assertions that they make. Real women have vaginas! (talk) 00:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)