User talk:Bailes2700

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

July 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Uncyclopedia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bailes2700! Thank you for your contributions. I am BFDIBebble and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! BFDIBebble (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Kevindongyt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Q788771. Thank you. NeedToReportSomebody1 (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Zombiebaron, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zombiebaron and Kevindongyt are paid employees of an Uncyclopedia fork trying to discredit the original site. My edits were not vandalism and I strongly urge you to retract your warnings against me. Bailes2700 (talk) 18:26, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your stance that ".ca" is the only website is unjustified and completely unacceptable. It has been consensus before ".ca" was brought into existance that ".co" is the "real" Uncyclopedia. I will not retract my warning, and I will proceed with further action if necessary. Kevindongyt (talk) 18:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kevindongyt: I’m not talking to you. I’m talking to the big boys. Bailes2700 (talk) 18:33, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Zombiebaron. CLCStudent (talk) 18:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bailes2700 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m not the one vandalizing. Zombiebaron and Kevindongyt are clearly trying to discredit BFDIBebble and I, as well as the legitimate Uncyclopedia. Please block them for disruption. Bailes2700 (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were reverting other users' comments and issuing bizarre warnings. Your unblock request only points fingers at other editors. The block will stand. ST47 (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ST47: Alright. But please ensure that when the protection to Uncyclopedia expires, these paid employees of the fork do not revert the current revision. All of the links point to the correct site right now, and I would hate to see it get protected for another 2 months with the forker’s promotion, as it did previously. Thank you. Bailes2700 (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bailes2700 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Cyberpower678 Please undo your edit to Uncyclopedia. You have protected the article revision with the wrong links. You’re letting them win. Bailes2700 (talk) 19:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. stwalkerster (talk) 19:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.