Jump to content

User talk:Baikal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chu'Tsai

[edit]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Chu'Tsai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Chu'Tsai. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wyatt Riot 13:58, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppetry

[edit]

your pattern of behaviour on Rajput is not just disruptive, it is reminiscent of that of the Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of DPSingh, an extremely tenacious and vitriolic troll that keeps revisiting the article. If you do not alter that behaviour, I will assume you are indeed such a sockpuppet and ban your account without further ado. If you are not DPSingh, now would be the time to stop acting like him. dab (𒁳) 18:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive? Care to explain why? Baikal 06:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Reversion of the whole article without discussing anything on Talk:Rajput
  2. No care for continuous calls for discussion through edit summaries
  3. Removal of {{sprotect}} tags without discussion
for example.--æn↓þæµß¶-ŧ-¢ 08:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
with ImpuMozhi (on Talk:Rajput), I am now convinced this is an SS account (he's used similar sleeper accounts before). dab (𒁳) 10:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My dear respected fellows

The article on Rajputs has two versions.The page is getting reverted everyday.However I only linked the information about origin of Rajputs.Do you think that the ancient Kshatriyas of India were completely wiped out of India before Muslims came to India.This is not true and nobody with a common sense can believe it.The four varnas were always in India and still are.While everybody wants to assert that Rajputs were of Scythian origin, they forget that Kshatriyas were also in India.If every Rajput is of Scythian origion than where are the Kshatriyas? Have they vanished or gone with wind.

--Shivbramh 04:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]