User talk:Bahamenballing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bahamenballing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not donate money to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

No reason to unblock. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 19:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Jon Einstein

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jon Einstein, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ~ Eóin (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jon Einstein

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Jon Einstein, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see you've got a couple of the standard notices, and I'm wondering if we can work together to stop the article you re-created, Jon Einstein, from being deleted.

Do you know of any published sources that discuss him? Anything that meets our guidelines for reliable sources (see WP:RS) would help. The problem is that, without any sources, there's no difference between an encyclopedic article and something that someone just made up. This is why one of our central policies is Verifiability (see WP:V) - everything that goes into Wikipedia has to be verifiable.

If you can find sources that discuss this guy, or help me to find some, we can improve the article. If not, I'm afraid that Wikipedia can't keep an article at all - and if you keep re-creating it, you're going to get blocked from editing. Any questions, post on my talk page (User talk:SheffieldSteel) Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 21:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jon Einstein

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Jon Einstein, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MHGW (talk) 21:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bahamenballing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not donate money to Wikipedia IF I am not unblocked. I have valuable information that I would like to contribute toward Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You're an abusive sockpuppet, and your last two 'requests' only prove it. — Blueboy 96 22:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.