User talk:Bagration1944
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page White Dog, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Collectionian - I accept your reversion to the article on the film "White Dog", but wish to point out that my removal of the reference to Jean Seberg's death, does not qualify as vandalism by any means. While finding the article to be an excellent one, I was not satisfied that the discussion of Jean Seberg's death was relevant, and acted in good faith in removing this reference. Furthermore, the term "Mysterious death" should not be used in the article, since the French Authorities, and numerous reliable sources such as the New York Times and the LA Times have given her cause of death.--Bagration1944 (talk) 20:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Furthermore, I was correct in changing the date of Romain Gary's death. As the article Wikipedia: Vandalism states: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." Regards, --Bagration1944 (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)