User talk:Bagbesh

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Bagbesh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! FloNight ^talk 21:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sharifa Dina bint 'Abdu'l-Hamid, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sharifa Dina bint 'Abdu'l-Hamid was changed by Bagbesh (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-24T09:21:37+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 13:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Euro 2008

Stop it already. Spain is group winner, study the tie-breaking rules. They won against both Russia and Sweden, and head to head record between the tied teams outweighs goal difference. Therefore Spain is group winner. dorftrottel (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Porsche Cayman. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. swa q 16:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, the material you are persistently trying to add to Porsche Cayman does not qualify for inclusion even with a reference, because per policy we do not add non-notable trivia like this to automobile articles. This policy reflects community consensus. If you disagree with it, by all means state your disagreement on the talk page for the relevant policy; consensus is not immutable. But please stop inserting the non-notable trivia. You risk violating the three-revert rule and antagonising other editors. Please remember that Wikipedia is a coöperative project, not a competitive one. Thanks for contributing coöperatively from now on. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C17:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

R1a article

Hi. Saw your recent edit to R1a. As a recent editor on the article your perspective on the talk page discussions right now would be appreciated. Things are slightly messy, but a few outside views might work wonders. I am writing to all recent editors of the article.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have it easy with a diff, so that you can compare two proposed versions of the R1a article. Most differences of opinion have been to do with wording, and the question of what is encyclopedic. For example, is the word haplogroup jargon that should be removed from this article about a haplogroup? See [1].--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dina bint 'Abdu'l-Hamid

The article Dina bint 'Abdu'l-Hamid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP since January 2008. I can't find significant coverage at reliable independent sources which verify the information in the article. I also can't find evidence that the notability criteria is met.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dina bint 'Abdu'l-Hamid for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Dina bint 'Abdu'l-Hamid, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dina bint 'Abdu'l-Hamid until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]