User talk:Badiacrushed

July 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to History of abortion, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Badiacrushed, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Badiacrushed! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

"Removing" information to Eric Greitens article?

Are you high? I did not remove the information? I just simply moved it out of the lead? 24.107.107.105 (talk) 01:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're a special kind of stupid 24.107.107.105 (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, you may be blocked from editing. 24.107.107.105 (talk) 03:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Despite your repeated attempts to add defamatory content to his article to push your own partisan agenda, Eric Greitens won the gubernatorial election. Although you had made yourself look quite stupid, don't be ashamed! Hope you are well. 24.107.107.105 (talk) 06:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

revert

Hi, I wanted to just say two things:

I only reverted because there's been no indication that the incident you added has gotten major coverage in the media. We're not trying to prove that Jones is a conspiracy theorist, as the facts do that quite nicely. We can stick to just the most notable incidents involving him and still paint an accurate picture. Going beyond that delves into WP:BLPVIO territory, which -trust me- you do not want to get mired in.
I read the transcript and, at first it seemed like he was going to make an analogy between Sheeple and Demonic possession. But then he goes on to talk about how many atheists and scientists he's met who believe in actual demonic possession and I laughed out loud. You gotta love how off-the-wall some people are. $ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.$ 22:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Sorry to bother you, but what exactly did you mean when you said you were a sockpuppet of User:Calamitybrook? Please see here, and thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Sobriquet for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you took offence at this warning. Is there something particular about this warning to which you took offence or just the general sentiment? If you've had time to read the various polices and guidelines that are linked in the warning, is there something there that you like to see changed? Is there any way I could help you in that endeavour? Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Aleksandr Torshin. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 03:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Aleksandr Torshin. Acroterion (talk) 04:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm an administrator, and this is your final warning that vague allegations of criminality are not tolerated. A repeat of this behavior will result in a block. Acroterion (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]