User talk:Bader15 h
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Bader15 h, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Bader15h...
[edit]Hope you are doing great. It's really fascinating working on Wikipedia edits. You can start describing your User page and contact an Ambassador if you need any mentor. Looking forward to have a great semester with you.
Thanks, Rahul JC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahuljc (talk • contribs) 16:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello Bader!
[edit]Hey there! Glad to see you in Wiki. We are part of the same team for wiki project, I'm sure we'll have fun this semester. All the best and enjoy!Asmat (talk) 20:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Feedback request
[edit]I got your message. Is there anything I can help you with? Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:44, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Additional feedback
[edit]Wikipedia articles don't give how-to advice and don't "speak" directly to readers.
Fully integrated: Users must be able to discuss their analysis alongside their BI content. Picture this scenario: You’re using your BI tool to search for data on last month’s sales results from the Americas. You find a startling anomaly – sales have skyrocketed compared to previous months. Why? What has been done differently? How can you replicate the results? If the CDM platform is within the BI tool, you can immediately start the investigation, inviting others into the conversation in full view of the data. There’s no need to set up meetings and discussions in isolation from your data set. The collaborative process remains clearly documented in a single open-access space, and discussion remains on topic – the underlying information (data) is right there. To enable successful CDM, both your collaborative platform and information should be in the one place.
The part that I italicized is unacceptable in terms of tone and violates one of the five pillars of what Wikipedia articles should be. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:59, 12 December 2016 (UTC)