User talk:Badanagram/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Read User:Badanagram to see how p****ed off the below has made me about Wikipedia admin behavior.

(Personal attack removed) Admin called me a coward after warning me about personal attacks.

How to complain about me

If you want to talk to SlimVirgin, try her talk page. Better yet, go to WP:ANI if you want to complain about my editing. Please be specific.

However creating pages like User talk:SlimVirgin Slimvirgin - Todds1 is completely abusing his admin tools. He had reconstructed my old userpage, deleted one of the articles I created out of spite and which I asked to be deleted for very good reason if the logs are checked. is not the way to do it. Toddst1 (talk) 07:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm making messy edits because a. I edit wikipedia very rarely because of people like you and b. you are freaking me out and scaring me. As I pointed out on the next edit.

Can you please leave me alone???? Badanagram (talk)

I've actually forgotten why I even came on to the site this morning because of you. Wikipedia is a tool for finding out about topics if interest, not overarching power games. That goes for you as well meatpuppet of Toddst1 User:Bwilkins , you need a reality check as well.

STOP IT NOW. THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE BEEN STALKING ALL MY USERPAGES AND EDITING THEM WITHIN SECONDS VERY WORRYING. STOP CYBERSTALKING

Sockpuppetry notices

Per WP:BLANKING, you may not remove a proven sockpuppetry notice from your user page. Please do not remove it again or I will be forced to have another admin block you. Toddst1 (talk) 07:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Right, seeing as you are very clever on wikipedia, perhaps you could remove both pages and my account. It would make life a whole lot easier for me not to have cyberstalkers. Badanagram (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

You're free to remove all the other content, but not the sockpuppet notice. Toddst1 (talk) 07:29, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Under what guidelines? Sockpuppets are people who create multiple accounts to consistently and constantly vandalise one page, I have been an editor in wikipedia for several years, all I did was disagree with one of your edits without logging on. My user contributions do not show consistent vandalism, perhaps a few silly edits here or there, but other than that I've made some good contributions, now because of people with bots that monitor my every move I don't feel that is possible any more.

The guideline is WP:Blanking. However, I just researched your username request and I understand why you don't want to be linked to your previous username. I'm willing to work with you (despite your recent behavior) here. If you make an edit below where you admit to using 86.11.254.79  (talk · contribs · / info · WHOIS) abusively, I will promise to do two things to help you:

1. I will replace the "evidence" link on your userpage with the admission - removing the reference to your old username
2. I will not block you for making such an admission - the evidence is beyond clear, so making such an admission is really only needed to accomplish #1 above.

Deal? Toddst1 (talk) 07:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Right, I apologise for using 86.11.254.79 (talk · contribs · info · WHOIS) to comment on your edit to something to do with cultural references to a song by the looks of things. I still disagree with the Sledgehammer-nut tactics employed to 'teach me a lesson' though. But I'll stop there to avoid a Godwins Law comparison Badanagram (talk) 07:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

It would also be a lot easier to make that admission without edit conflicts! Badanagram (talk) 07:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the e/c. I've replaced the evidence and removed the redirect. I'm moving on now. Cheers. Toddst1 (talk) 07:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

User:86.11.254.79 this page needs to be reviewed. I am moving out of this property within the next week or so. There is absolutely no reason for the people who live there to have their Wiki user page full of the nonsense that an over-eager admin created.