User talk:Bacon Noodles

Welcome!

Hello, Bacon Noodles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:The Sky at Night.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Sky at Night.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

File:2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine animated.gif

Possible updates to animated map for 2022 Ukraine invasion by Russia? It has no updates since 25 March? ErnestKrause (talk) 17:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ErnestKrause: I've now updated the animation to include the days since the last update. — Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 18:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two weeks later and same request; its up to 21 April now. ErnestKrause (talk) 17:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ErnestKrause: I've now updated it for the changes over the last few week, however, the day-to-day changes have been notably slowed and the number of days without any visible changes (at least in the map file) is almost most days, which means updates, unless there are any major changes, may still be sporadic. — Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 18:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current map in the Invasion section for the article for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine seems to not give any dates past 9 April, not even one. Is that what you meant, no dates covered after 9 April? ErnestKrause (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ErnestKrause: It's probably because you're seeing a cached version, which is the previous version (up to 9 April), it's usually somewhere in your browser settings to clear/refresh it. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/2022_Russian_Invasion_of_Ukraine_animated.gif

It seems to have taken overnight, though its working well now and someone else has already updated the date range in the caption. Nice going. ErnestKrause (talk) 18:46, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Air Koryo Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Air Koryo Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment

Firstly your manner is rather poor including saying I'm " 'questionable' user;" ( there was a case in 2011 where pics had to be within reason nor flood the page, the I love the 90s now has 9 pics, what do they actually add? "Absolutely Fabulous characters, in 2016."?? ) if that is your way of engagement that I would rather deal with another user to sort out any issues. I have spoken with many and there not gone to the same level as you. CLEARLY your the only one that thinks it it's something deliberate.

Also maybe the WordPress blog directly plagiarism of Wiki page??? Funny that wiki page has ALOT of refs, but the Word press blog doesn't? blog Dated 9 April 2015 YET.. OH look what is this? wiki page from 30 march 2015. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TV-am&oldid=654198121 4 months before the Blog post aswell.. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TV-am&oldid=642213855 took me seconds to double check this. Please find another user, I wont deal with your goodself. --Crazyseiko (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Crazyseiko: There's no reason for you to be hostile; when someone, such as yourself, edits on numerous pages with as many spelling and grammatical errors, non-immediately verifiable cites (such as page 10 in a random 80s newspaper), it's often a case of hurried editing by someone not intent on adding to the content - a style you have maintained on your message, here.

Firstly, specifically addressing I Love the '90s (British TV series), it is my view that the images on that page add to the commentary and theme of reviewing subjects from the 1990s, by demonstrating their individual relevance, style, or connection to the respective years, using images that are freely licensed and available to be included (which, admittedly is somewhat limited). I did not blanket revert your decision to remove every image, unilaterally, because some images did not necessarily add as much (i.e. Vic and Bob), which is more in line with Wikipedia Manual of Style regarding images. Simply removing every image because there isn't a better photo of characters in a 1992 show than a parade 24 years later, suggests your hostility. Slightly subjective, but, if you're looking for impact, if two characters can stay relevant for 24 years, it seems they're important enough to show.

Secondly, I was merely pointing out that both the TV-am page and a personal blog by someone on Wordpress had the same content, and had never even remotely suggested you were involved in copying the text from either which way. However, as it is a subject you were editing and you concerned yourself with, it seemed appropriate to mention it because, as you have also done, you've reviewed to dates of edits to confirm it was not copied. And, despite your actions to numerous pages, I did not simply delete swathes on an impulse because I did not jump to conclusions without properly checking.

Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, you should review your spelling and phrasing because "there" is not the same as "they're (they are)," despite sounding the same. Nor does "wont" mean anything, compared to "won't (will not)," so also review the Wikipedia Manual of Style, regarding apostrophes. If you want to appear to not be a vandal, let alone someone who can edit objectively, consider reviewing what you've typed before pressing the publish button on future and past edits. I have, so far, acted in good faith, I don't think it would necessarily be true to say the same of you.

You don't need to type in all caps, you just need a little humility and thought. -- Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 16:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adamstom.97 Ownership concerns over Star Trek articles

Original message -- Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 22:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revised version -- Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 19:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TL;DR version:

Stats are there, 80% authorship isn't normal (Obi-Wan Kenobi (TV series) page statistics)
Don't patronise me, when I'm just pointing out the trend, not one edit on ratings
If there's a problem, another editor can also change it, not just you
Talk about a change, unless it's clear vandalism or indisputably disruptive
Your opinion as "experienced" is not automatically better than a newer user
Don't always treat your opinion as fact or absolute

-- Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 19:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the massive WP:WALLOFTEXT comment that you have left at my talk page per WP:DTR. I recognise that you put a lot of effort into it and that you naturally appear to always write super long comments, but I don't think it is appropriate to a) continue with your bad faith accusations, and b) leave such a patronising message for an experienced editor who clearly knows what WP:OWN is. It is true that I am the primary contributor for some of the more recent Star Trek articles, they are just some of the genre film/TV topics that I am interested in and spend a lot of time working on. But I am not the only editor who works on them and you can see from the discussions that we are involved in that I clearly do work in with other editors and form consensus during disputes. Multiple editors have now made it clear to you that there is established consensus at WP:TV and Star Trek: Discovery to not include rerun ratings, and everyone commenting on the new discussion agrees with that consensus. So pretending that this is still an issue of ownership of the article is ridiculous, unless you are accusing everyone who has commented on the discussion of ownership? As I said at MOS:TV, your continued accusations, despite evidence clearly being to the contrary, is starting to feel like you are WP:HOUNDING me in an attempt to get me to back off. If you continue to do this I will be reporting you for harassment, so please stop. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity, I have broken my response into three sections, roughly headlined, which respond to your points. I just write loads to be clear, not to spam or give eye ache.

Trends, Not Just One Edit:

My concern is not with the discussion on my edit to Star Trek: Discovery; my concern is how you dealt with it, and how it was not the first edit to receive similar treatment, as well as the effect of what I read to be the signs of ownership behaviour has on future edits by more contributors. Dismissing this as some sort of harassment suggests a lack of acceptance, perhaps as far as denial, to the trends and some of the available evidence I have stated, which are freely there for anyone else to review. Nowhere have I suggested there is a ring or group of editors, taking a perceived ownership over Star Trek articles, it's only you @Adamstom.97:.

Just You:

Unlike the talk page discussion on my edit, where multiple other users have been able to voice their disagreement on including it and are clear it is their opinion, not all of them have a (page) history of rushing to revert good faith edits over years by multiple editors, bypassing any discussion, and asserting a dominance on what may or may not be suitable. I didn't go through everything because that would be OTT, but just on the first page, your abrupt style of content removal is consistent and is not present on any other comparable page(s).

Statistic References:

The stats are just to show you may have bias to content you've added, hence your possessiveness over the pages, since 82% is ~78% more than the person in second (a bot) and, again, not typical. For full disclosure, the stats show I'm next at 1.1%, and all I've added was someone's SVG logo file name and three lines on ratings (unlikely to stick around), where half the characters are references. The next non-bot doesn't even have a full percent.

-- Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 19:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My ANI post

Hi, Bacon Noodles. I really don't want to pester you on your page, but since I posted a warning in the ANI thread, I think I should make sure you see it, with a link here. If you want to respond to my comment, ANI would be a better place than here, for more eyes. Bishonen | tålk 08:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: I've added a reply on that page, I didn't ping you there because I'd rather have it as a continuation, instead of one reply. Basically, thank you for your direct and calm address, it's considerably more helpful to the situation. (Also, thanks for embedding the link, I thought it had to be a URL.) -- Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 00:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone Admires You [Surprised Pikachu Face]

Greetings Great Baconer of Noodles (Or is it noodler of bacons?)

I just wanted to say thank you for all of your work with the Ukraine war animations. I also absolutely adore your page and thought I'd take a moment to fanboy at you. This is a super interesting profile page!

Have a blessed rest of your day, and I pray you find everyone you are looking for!

Warm Regards, -- A Secret Admirer (talk • contribs • uploads) — Preceding undated comment added 17:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Originally, I would have said bacon is added to the noodles, until I considered it would probably be better to add the noodles to the bacon, so that the noodles can use the drippings coating the pan. -- Bacon Noodles (talk • contribs • uploads) 01:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eurovision 2023 Official Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eurovision 2023 Official Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Ætoms ^[talk] 17:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TAAG Angola Airlines logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TAAG Angola Airlines logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Air Koryo logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Air Koryo logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Air Koryo logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Air Koryo logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]