User talk:Backshesh
Copyright problems with Laser Phosphor Display
[edit]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Laser Phosphor Display, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.physorg.com/news196574334.html. As a copyright violation, Laser Phosphor Display appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Laser Phosphor Display has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Laser Phosphor Display and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Laser Phosphor Display with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Laser Phosphor Display.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Laser Phosphor Display and send an email with the message to permissions-en
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 03:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Red House Glory
[edit]Hello Backshesh,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Red House Glory for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Cdtew (talk) 21:53, 23 December 2012 (UTC)