Jump to content

User talk:Backdoc47

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Backdoc47 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This block was instigated due to a vicious vendetta against a Chiropractor/user called drsjpdc, exactly BECAUSE he is a Chiropractor. If anyone actually cares, they will investigate and see, as I did, that drsjpdc was the victim of a dirty slanderous attack that included his son (whom they outed in violation of Wikipedia policy... and who was ultimately vindicated), as well as innocent third parties, like platinumphotographer, and some guy in teaneck, NJ only because they came to drsjp's defense. I suppose they figure that if they attack anyone who comes to his side, and with an admin power they CAN keep abusing their power. They can keep other Chiropractors from editing on wikipedia and changing the culture that prevents anything positive from appearing here on that subject, thus skewing it beyond recognition. As to the blocking of this account as the supposed sockpuppet of drsjpdc is concerned; even if this were true, the reasons given in their noticeboard were that they believe that I am he, because:
* I have significant experience editing on the wiki model, because get this- the quality of my edits was very HIGH!!!!; and, * My username has the number 47 in it and they allege that he was born in that year; and, * that I must be a "Chiropractor, because "no MD would call themselves "Backdoctor"... BTW: I'm a spine surgeon. So, all the distinguished medical doctors Wildor Hollmann and Eduardo De Rose and a great musician Steve Leeds, and others including a NY State Senator Abraham Bernstein(politician) had their bios wiped off wikipedia despite being totally notable and the bios of high Wiki quality, just BECAUSE they allege I am the same guy they banned ALSO for no real reason except that he wrote quality articles about his own profession, not about himself. And, BTW: I have no particular love of Chiros. They thus accused him of "Self Promotion"??? Are we kidding??? What's fair is fair. This is NOT. That means that no Musician can write about music, and no MD can write about medicine. The ONLY real basis for their community ban of drsjpdc was that he was once banned before (also instigated by wikidan and brangifer), and it was so egregious that Jimmy Wales himself had to get him unbanned. The guy said in his answers, that he left wikipedia for four years, apparently thinking that was enough of an exile, and all this is due to his forgetting to kneel before these vengeful monsters to ask permission to return to writing in the medical field again. And THAT is why all these other bios are wiped out??? Frankly this is a MONSTROUS abuse of power on this site. I write for other Wikis, and THAT is how I have the skills to write the bios I wrote here.
Someone with the guts to do so, seriously needs to bring charges against WIKIDAN and BRANGIFER for "meatpuppetry" and have THEM banned for egregious abuse of their power. Also, on further investigation, it appears that BRANGIFER himself has several sockpuppets; FYSLEE and PAULLEE, and Bull Rangifer, all the SAME guy. And, on information, knowledge and belief he either is or was an employee of one Stephen Barrett, a failed psychiatrist, who is a notorious, known crusader against Chiropractic. So all of them are strongly suspect POV's.
SOMEONE PLEASE INVESTIGATE THIS. Backdoc47 (talk) 16:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC) Backdoc47 (talk)[reply]

Decline reason:

I investigated and saw that WP:Checkuser confirmed that you are editing from the same IP address as DrsJPDC. You've given no valid reason for an unblock, and it's also clear that you not here to build an encyclopedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Backdoc47 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I ask another, impartial Admin to review this, and actually investigate my allegations, no knee-jerk support for the revenge being perpetrated against me, and BTW anyone supporting me, in the name of purging someone they just don't like. Also, I understand the function of Checkuser, and even how its used, and still do not know how they could have come to that conclusion. It's just wrong....
But let's just for the moment, assume that it was right... Your statement that I am "not here to build an encyclopedia" is based on what? Has anyone but the vengeful people I named, actually looked at the volume of work that was done by this user name? Or can't you see the bios I did because they have cutely deleted them en masse... for example, Steve Leeds, Wildor Hollmann, Eduardo de Rosa or Abraham Bernstein (politician)'s bios... What was in any way "disruptive" or "self promotional" the allegations are absurd and slanderous. Give me an example... please.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 20:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocks levied based upon Checkuser tool results are by and large unassailable, and are based on technical evidence, not behavioural. Disparaging other users won't get you unblocked in any circumstance. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]