User talk:Babybunny2007

Welcome!

Hello, Babybunny2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! -Lemonaka 02:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -Lemonaka 02:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Deletion

Please consider not creating any more nominations. You are a new user and need to get more experience beforehand. See also links in previous posts. Geschichte (talk) 12:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. I came to say the same thing. It can take some time to learn how Wikipedia works. It happens to everyone. But you need to slow down, as virtually your every edit has been undone, and your AFD are being very quickly rejected. It's a pretty clear sign that you need to stop and learn the basics. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 12:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Babybunny2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was involved in AfD (Articles for Deletion) related topics and may have done some edits that were considered disruptive. it seems i have now been permanently blocked from editing due to these actions. I take responsibility for my behavior, have deleted my AfD nominations, and will not engage in any similar behavior moving forward. i sincerely regret my actions and hope that you can consider lifting the block." Babybunny2007 (talk) 13:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not why you were blocked. You don't mention your violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE at all. Yamla (talk) 16:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To be clear, they're also blocked for the AFD disruption. Just in case they get a silly idea this is just a technicality for evasion. -- ferret (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Babybunny2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator, I am writing a request that my account be unblocked. I acknowledge and understand the reasons for my initial blocking, including my involvement in Articles for Deletion (AfD), as well as my actions that led to being blocked. I assure you that I have learned from my mistakes and I am committed to adhering to the guidelines and policies moving forward. I request an opportunity to demonstrate this through responsible and positive contributions to the Wikipedia community. Babybunny2007 (talk) 19:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Appeal fails to address WP:SOCK violations. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still don't mention your violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 20:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And if this editor is who I think it is, they've learned nothing, as their AFD nominations are as bad as ever. Sergecross73 msg me 21:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technical data is

Highly likely and the behavioural evidence is completely unambiguous. Ferret did the block and probably saw something I missed, enough to confirm sockpuppetry. I don't think anyone doubts the accuracy of the block here. I'll go revoke TPA to match that on the sockmaster. Ryan barnes isn't particularly good at this. --Yamla (talk) 22:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, 100% agree. I do not doubt ferret in the least, I just didn't see the user page tag earlier. Sergecross73 msg me 22:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Babybunny2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia administration, I am writing to request an unblock for my account, which was previously blocked due to sockpuppetry, Articles for Deletion (AfD), and block evasion. I acknowledge that my actions violated the community's guidelines and policies, and I regret my involvement in those activities. Since my block, I have taken time to familiarize myself with the Wikipedia rules and standards. I understand the importance of maintaining a collaborative and respectful environment for all users, and I am committed to contributing positively to the community moving forward. Babybunny2007 (talk) 23:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is going no where. This user is WP:3X community banned. Read WP:GAB, WP:SO, and maybe try an appeal from your original account in six months without any further evasion. -- ferret (talk) 00:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You created a sock puppet account and made the same stupid sort of edits that got your previous accounts blocked. Just stop, no admin would unblock after such conduct. Sergecross73 msg me 23:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]