User talk:Bababoum

Welcome!

Hello, Bababoum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rje 14:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obafemi Martins

You have replaced: "Martins is known for his pace, powerful shots and spectacular celebrations.

Although relatively short, Martins has a good leap and the Nigerian based newspaper 'The Daily Sun' reported that he used to be very good at the long jump and high jump.[1]"

With:

"Martins is known for his powerful shots, acrobatic celebrations and also his speed. He can reportedly run 100 meters in less than 10.5 seconds (Olympic quality). His speed usually enables him to get behind defenders and create one-on-one chances with the goalkeeper. He is also very good at the long jump and high jump"

Twice now, I just want to tell you why I have reverted it back. The main problem is that this part of the article (as I put on the talk page) pre-dates the Daily-Sun's article and if you compare the two complete articles you'll find that huge parts have been lifted, presumably from the wiki text as it pre-dates the other. So using the newspaper for a source is a little problematic and I can't find anything else that confirms it, fair enough if you can. The other problem is that the newspaper only says it is rumoured that he used to be able to run 100m in under 11 seconds. Not that he can run it now in under 10.5 seconds. We can't put everything in that has just been rumoured in a Nigerian tabloid paper otherwise wiki would fill up with nonsense. Same thing goes for the long and high jump which he used to be good at.Stev17 14:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:FA Premier League players

I'm sorry to moan at you, but....this category states: This category is for footballers who have appeared in the English Premier League. Many of them are not Englishmen. However I've noticed you've added some players who have never played in the Premier League, and have been merely signed on as players for Prem clubs. I've reverted a few of the ones I can spot that have been wrongly added, eg Joe Hart. A surprising one was Pascal Zuberbühler who has never been registered to a Prem club. Please be careful. Laters. Slumgum T. C. 20:54, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yohann Gourcuff

Please see Yoann Gourcuff. Perhaps your article should be a redirect to it. Slumgum T. C. 13:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies about this. Yes I think it should be a redirect. Bababoum 13:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Current FA Premier League players

If you are ever adding Category:FA Premier League players to any player articles, could you also add Category:Current FA Premier League players to the article if they are currently playing in the league? It would be a big help. I'm aiming to add this category to as many current players as possible before the Premiership season starts. Regards. Mark272 16:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, certainly. In return will you also try to add players to the FA Premier League players category whenever necessary. I've been trying to remember as many players that I can who have appeared in the Premiership and it's not easy. It would be very appreciated. Bababoum 17:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to butt in, but footballsquads.com might be of use to that end. Slumgum T. C. 16:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's excellent. Thanks Slumgum Bababoum 21:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newcastle United LFC

Thanks for creating the Newcastle United LFC article. I just wanted to reassure you that you did get the article's name right, in the end. Thanks again! --StuartBrady (Talk) 01:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks, it took me a while to get the name right! Thanks for fixing the redirects as well. Bababoum 08:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rolando Bianchi

Hi there, Bababoum.

Why the article was originally deleted, frankly, is a mystery to me too. I can't think that he, at the time the article first existed, he wasn't worthy of an article. The most important thing, though, is that it's back, and it looks like he's going to remain an important figure in Italian football for at least the first half, if not the whole of this season. Bobo . 17:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bababoum said:
Thanks for clearing this up Bobo. It does seem bizarre that the article was originally deleted but at least it's back.

I just think it's as simple as him having had such a good start to the season that he now warrants an article. Suddenly everyone's stood up and took notice, and with that, comes a new Wikipedia article. Regards. Bobo . 10:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of football players with dual nationality

Thanks for all you hard work on this page, especially the subpages! Glad to find a fellow Wikipedian who is as interested in the subject as I am! GiantSnowman 14:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem GS, glad to have helped! Bababoum 17:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Frankie boyle.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Frankie boyle.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 48 hours after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2s • talk 23:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obafemi Martins in IPA

I assume it is [əʊbə'femi ækɪn'wʊnmi 'mɑː(r)tɪnz], when pronounced in an English-language context. Bye. —Emanuele Saiu 15:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 8 April - 15 April

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Liverpool F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

AfD nomination of Rubén Manusovich

An editor has nominated Rubén Manusovich, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubén Manusovich and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 22 April - 29 April

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Leeds United A.F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Football AID 6 May - 13 May

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Jairzinho has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Login unsuccessful

Sorry, I don't have access to the databases anymore. Try user:Brion VIBBER or user:Tim Starling. --Magnus Manske 18:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Mocktheweek.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mocktheweek.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Frosties_kid.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Frosties_kid.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MER-C 11:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Soccerbase.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Soccerbase.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nigerian footballers

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article List of Nigerian footballers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jogurney 15:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Slovenian footballers

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article List of Slovenian footballers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jogurney 14:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Ergas

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article David Ergas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rorymcgrath.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rorymcgrath.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:36, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Numberwangstage.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Numberwangstage.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Atkin

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Liam Atkin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ArtVandelay13 09:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bump the elephant.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bump the elephant.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bump the elephant.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bump the elephant.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Davidedgar150.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Davidedgar150.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rette tast 16:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ChrisTarrant.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:ChrisTarrant.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ross dress.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ross dress.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Numberwangstage.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Numberwangstage.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Otto4711 (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Phil Cave

I have nominated Phil Cave, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Cave. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. robwingfield ^«T•C» 20:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Ducros

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Andy Ducros, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Andy Ducros. Oo7565 (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RickyGervaisFNWJR.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:RickyGervaisFNWJR.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:JimCarrey.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:JimCarrey.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:FKTeleoptikBadge.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:FKTeleoptikBadge.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Film2006.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Film2006.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fkventabadge.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Fkventabadge.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:17, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:DavidCameronFNWJR.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:DavidCameronFNWJR.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Danish footballers

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Danish footballers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Danish footballers. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Giant Snowman 15:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bababoum! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 51 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Stijn Schaars - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michel Vorm - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Remko Pasveer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Carlos Tejas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Craig (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Osa Guobadia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Vinícius Bergantin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:FNWJR.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FNWJR.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Footballfocus1.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Footballfocus1.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notify author/project: ==Proposed deletion of Sandy Mutch==

The article Sandy Mutch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find published (gBook) support for this subject winning the FA Cup, as this is the primary claim to notablity the article fails WP:V and WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Matchoftheday2studio.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Matchoftheday2studio.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:28, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johnson Hippolyte

The article Johnson Hippolyte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 07:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jarle Flo

The article Jarle Flo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable: fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Jarle Flo

Hello Bababoum, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jarle Flo, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarle Flo.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jarle Flo has been accepted

Jarle Flo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]