User talk:Baba i deda

Vandalism

Your recent editing history at Unsimulated sex shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Follow the BRD process linked above, and don't mark your edits as "minor". -- Brangifer (talk) 15:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Baba i deda, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Baba i deda! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Unsimulated sex may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Unsimulated sex may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:44, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing talk page comments

Please do not edit or remove other people's talk page comments. Please see WP:TPG for our guidelines on expected behavior. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Petrb. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Clip (film) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 12:08, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Baba i deda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Baba i deda. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsmimulated

Hi Baba, please review the criteria for films in the list as you seem to be adding things without realizing what they actually are. Short films are not mainstream films. They are never released on their own in a wide, mainstream theatres. That one you just added is 14 minutes long. Ditto, Water in Milk Exists is not a film, it's something you'd see in an installation by the artist in an art gallery, not a regular cinema and again, it's not anywhere near the right length. Finally, never cite IMDB as an authority for anything as it's not RS. It's basically user-generated content, just like a wiki. Useful for you to check out before finding real RS, but it's not a source of verified information. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 04:44, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've had to remove a few more you had added that I'd not noticed. I realize English is not your first language, so you may not always get the nuances. But please be aware that when film reviewers use the words "graphic", "explicit", they are not saying that it's unsimualted. Period. What it means is, you can see someone doing something that looks a lot like something but still may not actually be something. It's like the difference between the camera showing people in bed and showing naked people writhing on the bed, or a bit of flesh in the dark as opposed to an actual genital organ attached to an actual body, etc. We cannot make claims about living persons (actors, directors) without solid, unimpeachable and unambiguous sources per WP:BLP. Also, you've been around long enough to know that references need to be formatted in a way that makes it clear what the source is without having to click on it. It's not good enough to just have a blue link that says "Release Info"--which turns out to be a link to an entry on IMDB or something else equally unacceptable. I know you mean well, just slow down a bit, take your time: there is WP:NORUSH. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 04:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Baba i deda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsimulated again

Baba, I am glad to see you looking for and finding better sources. Just one thing. Please stop using abbreviations such as h/c and s/c, HC or SC. It's not encyclopedic. Do you think the average person out there, outside the context of this article, has ever seen these before? I guarntee you they have not. We can't use random unestablished abbreviations in an encyclopedia. I notice you are even taking existing sentences where "hardcore" is used and replacing it with "h/c". Why? To make it shorter? These are not details, they are the basis for whether the entry even exists. This is like point form, coming across incomplete and unprofessional. And please work on your English grammar in general, particularly articles. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]