User talk:Baba Louis

Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn

Thanks for your input on The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Inc.. Do you think you could also put Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn on your watch list? The same characters are pushing their pov into that article with a revert war as well. -999 (Talk) 19:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Baba and thanks for the note. I took a look at the pages and it once again appears that some of the editors don't understand Wikipedia very well... Anyway, now that the page is under mediation I'll keep watching from the sidelines. Chai Walla 18:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intentional vandalism?

Hi there. It seems you have recently reverted the adding of the 'in mediation' tag to several articles as blatant vandalism. However, it may be helpful to review WP:VANDALISM. The addition of those templates appears to be a mere misunderstanding of policy, and labeling it as blatant vandalism will not improve matters. Remember to stay cool and assume good faith of other editors. My opinion as a neutral third party is that it seems that Frater is indeed making attempts at mediation, and that threatening him with a community ban will only escalate matters. If you'd like to have the possibility of a ban addressed, it may be a good idea to first get an administrator's opinion of the matter and then see arbitration. Otherwise, others might interpret the comment as a personal attack. Thanks. Cowman109^Talk 16:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see you've made a post on the admiinistrator's noticeboard. That's a good first step. Disregard what I said about how to go about reporting that, then. Nonetheless, remember to remain WP:CIVIL and try not to provoke Frater. I have asked 999 and Frater to do the same concerning eachother to prevent matters from escalating. Cowman109^Talk 16:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Frater FiatLux

Just got your message. Sure I can help some... -999 (Talk) 21:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think I got most of the chronology... -999 (Talk) 00:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. -999 (Talk) 15:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of my user page

Please discontinue messing with my user page. Kephera975 05:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to target users' pages for vandalism you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS} 14:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Sure... —Hanuman Das 20:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. —Hanuman Das 21:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baba, please review WP:TPG. I dont appreciate being called a bozo on other peoples talk pages. Thanks. Zos 02:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for fixing the majority of the issues on the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. The structure looks way better. Oh and Frater FiatLux changed something you changed, check the history. :p Zos 02:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha et Omega

The only problem is, there is already an article for this: Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Rosicrucian Order of A+O). I'll be more than happy to contribute, as its on my list of the many related pages to add to in the ever present stubs. Might we just redirect/merge? Zos 16:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I checked my messages first. I see you've already found that article. Might I ask why we need to have two articles of the same nature? I was actually going to add to the history of the longer named one. Zos 16:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am also feeling inclined to create an article for Isis-Urania, as I think I have enough sources to claim non stub status. Zos 23:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Baba Louey!

Say, when you get a chance, could you drop by the Thelema article. Seems user Dan is intent on biasing the article against Rabelaisian Thelema. —Hanuman Das 05:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tantra

I just wanted to let you know that this terrible article on Tantra is being rewritten from scratch with proper references and citations at Tantra/temp. Perhaps you could contribute if you have time? -999 (Talk) 15:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archives