Jump to content

User talk:Baba's camel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Baba's camel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Scrubs (TV series). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Scjessey (talk) 22:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although you are right to get rid of these images, there is no excuse for edit warring. I have reported the offender to WP:3RR for edit warring - please don't make me do the same to you. -- Scjessey (talk) 22:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule#Exceptions, edits which remove "copyright violations or content that unquestionably violates the non-free content policy" are considered exceptions to this rule. The images the other editor had uploaded were definitely in violation of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria: no fair use rationales for the article, no copyright tags. As far as I can see, I'm guilty of no violation here. Baba's camel (talk) 22:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On an unrelated note... why is it that you seem to be on a crusade to take care of the Scrubs NFU images, and not other article's? Qb | your 2 cents 13:04, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]