User talk:BVRT11

talk page revoked. If you wish to appeal this block further you may contact the Arbitration Committee by email as detailed at WP:BASC 15:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). BVRT11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Unblock me right now you b******s I am NOT this User:Dweeby123, If you don't unblock me I will involve the police and my lawyers so on your head be it --BVRT11 (talk) 19:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Decline reason: Personal attacks and empty legal threats. This boys and girls is a textbook example of how not to request an unblockJac16888 Talk 19:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). BVRT11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: How many more times I am not User:Dweeby123, Mark my words if you don't unblock me I will just make another account so it's up to you BVRT11 (talk) 19:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Decline reason: The problem is, even if I did believe you (which I don't) you made a legal threat in your last request. Per WP:LEGAL we are not allowed to unblock you until that threat has been unambiguously retracted. And the threat to sockpuppet further does little to convince that you were ever acting in good faith to begin with, so there's that as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). BVRT11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Alright then I retract the threat - I can't be bothered with the paperwork to be honest can I be unblocked now? Decline reason: Checkuser confirmed sock. TNXMan 20:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Since I've already declined you once I won't be reviewing this, but I have been looking into the SPI. I had forgotten that I had some involvement in the initial block of the alleged puppeteer. After reviewing the background further I am convinced that this is indeed the same user. The attitude, and the focus on getting unblocked while failing to address the actual reason for the block are the same as Dweeby 123. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). BVRT11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Please all I am asking for is a chance to prove myself just let me prove to you that I can be a good Wikipedian, I mean whatever happened to AGF??, Pleaase one FINAL chance is all I am asking okay I admit it I did sockpuppetry and I am User:Dweeby123, but the ONLY reason why I did it was because nobody would unblock that account when I put a unblock request on there 2-3 weeks ago, I know sockpuppetry is wrong but nobody will listen to me I love editing pages on Wikipedia I don't want to be blocked just look into your heart and give me a final chance that is all I am asking for IF I mess up then it will be on my own doing nobody else's, One more and final chance is all I am asking BVRT11 (talk) 07:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Decline reason: So, you lied. It's also possible you have edited while logged out, as an evasion of your block. When you are blocked, that means YOU, the PERSON are blocked. Your best (and FINAL CHANCE) is to follow WP:OFFER. In short, you may not edit Wikipedia AT ALL for at least 6 months - including anonymously. You must be able to show positive contributions to another Wikimedia project. You will then return to your ORIGINAL account, and request unblock as per WP:OFFER. Any violations will result in an immediate decline, and re-set of the clock. See you in April (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user has a suspiciously similar edit history to User:92.39.201.36, who in Talk:Shoprite (Isle of Man) has made it clear they were also User:31.172.174.151. Looking through the history of edits to Shoprite (Isle of Man) they are most probably also User:178.16.0.77, User:87.254.71.166, User:217.23.166.158 and a whole host of other ip addresses! Bopalula (talk) 08:30, 11 October 2011 (UTC) The thing here is that you, as a blocked editor, have to convince me, as an admin, that you will edit within policy if you're unblocked. Your reaction to being blocked here was to flip out - and to lie about sockpuppetry. This makes it really hard to trust you, as I'm sure you can see. I'll leave your request for another admin to review, as I can't approve it. You should also respond to Bopalula's comment - have you used other usernames or IPs to edit, in addition to the ones you're admitting to now? UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)