User talk:BROBX

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Angryapathy (talk) 06:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Panic! at the Disco. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 10:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a personalized note: I do not know if you are affiliated with this band in any way, but we have a set of mechanisms in place that exist regarding pages. Edit warring and refusing to discuss the issue when asked is just not how Wikipedia does things, though: please make use of the talk page. Also, FYI, I believe you are mistaken about the definition of vandalism: see WP:NOTVAND and my personal pet WP:DV. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 10:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Angryapathy (talk) 07:08, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Panic! at the Disco. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. T. Canens (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dallon James Weekes.png

The file File:Dallon James Weekes.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]