User talk:BPac180

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, BPac180! Thank you for your contributions. I'm CaptainEek and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. I am always willing to help folks out! You can also check out the friendly Teahouse to ask any questions you might have. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Smooth sailing, CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion

I noticed that you're raise the request for restore Draft:Leah Lamarr more than once in the pages I mentioned above. This is unnecessary because admin and me can always see it. I have removed one of them, thanks.

In case you don't know where it is, it is the user talk page which is where I and community can talk with you. Thanks. 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 04:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kris Ruby

Hello. I suggest you refrain from posting about Kris Ruby, as you seem to be on a negative campaign about her. She is a living person, and thus the strict WP:BLP standards apply to her. Your latest edit [1] was to re-add a questionable and only tangentially related source for a statement that was already sourced. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 09:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Penny (whistleblower) (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikehawk10 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In order to demonstrate that this person meets notability guidelines, you need to show in-depth coverage of the individual from multiple independent reliable sources. These sources must be independent of each other and independent of the individual. Simply having written articles oneself doesn't make a person notable; having multiple in-depth articles written about you by an independent reliable source does.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Penny (whistleblower) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brian Penny (whistleblower), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BPac180! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, BPac180. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Brian Penny, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please also do not spam links to pages such as thoughtforyourpenny.com and typo.today. – NJD-DE (talk) 09:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Not trying to be spammy nor self promotional. Just sticking to what I actually know firsthand. Will make sure to link to better sources moving forward.BPac180 (talk) 09:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as you appear interested only in harassing others or self promotion, Wikipedia does not seem to be the right place for you. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Brian Penny (whistleblower)

Hello, BPac180. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brian Penny (whistleblower), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brian Penny (whistleblower)

Hello, BPac180. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brian Penny".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]