User talk:BP-Aegirsson

Welcome!

Hello, BP-Aegirsson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

assistance needed

There's a new rather unsophisticated Draft, Multiphoton microscopy thatoverlaps the 2 articles you have worked on, Second-harmonic imaging microscopy and Two-photon excitation microscopy. I've marked that draft for duplication, but if there is material you want to add, take a look at it. DGG ( talk ) 06:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC) >>Sure I'll look at it;)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Second-harmonic imaging microscopy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Colon, Cervical, Stroma and Meniscus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second-harmonic imaging microscopy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meniscus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Low technology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Technique, Archaic and Lifestyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages

Hi BP. In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

Note that we do have to publish under real names, so if you don't want your real name associated to your username, you may have to choose atopic that your username has not previously edited.

Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).

All the best - T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 02:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]