User talk:Rastrojo

Fair use disputed for Image:Tierra Comunera Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Tierra Comunera Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BM Valladolid Logo.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:BM Valladolid Logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot block

Your bot has been blocked, as it has not yet been approved. It can be unblocked after approval. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 01:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to operate a bot has been reopened. It can be located at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BOTarate. Sorry for the revolving door. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot request

Hi Rastrojo I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BOTarate has been approved. Please visit the above link for more information. Thanks! BAGBot 18:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot behaviour while fixing double redirects

Hi,
This is a minor issue, but BOTarate fixed a double-redirect (this edit), however left the {{R from other capitalisation}} in place. Ideally, the bot should check for this template and reevaluate it's validity, and remove it if it is not a capitalization redirect. It's minor, but I thought I'd let you know anyhow. +mt 16:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the Death's-head Hawkmoth article

The Death's-head Hawkmoth article is NOT the same as the article for Acherontia atropos in the English Wikipedia. If the Spanish Wikipedia wishes to have it as a single article, that is their choice, but in the English Wikipedia, they are separate articles, and you should take steps from preventing your bot from trying to edit the English Wikipedia entry as if it also referred to only a single species. What I would respectfully suggest is that you translate all four articles (the Death's-head Hawkmoth article and the three articles for the three Acherontia species) into the Spanish Wikipedia, and that way there will be no further conflict between the two versions and your bots will stop trying to make such changes. Dyanega (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templates with documentation

Hi. This is in response to this edit made by your bot to Template:Launching (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). There are two problems with the edit. Firstly, it is an interwiki to the template documentation page on the Spanish Wikipedia, and secondly, it is in such a place as to be included when the template is transcluded. Please can you modify your bot to eliminate these errors. Thanks. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 21:32, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I am slightly concerned that you don't appear to be responding to queries/bug reports relating to your bot. Thanks --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 14:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing that up. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 18:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CB Valladolid Logo.svg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CB Valladolid Logo.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your speedy deletion tagging

Despite what some people may think, it is not against policy to edit articles about yourself. Conflict of interest is not a deletion criteria, let alone a speedy deletion criteria; please do not tag articles for speedy deletion as you did here. — iridescent 14:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot error

Hello. BOTarate added a Spanish link to The Quatermass Experiment, when the Spanish article is in fact on the 1955 film version, which already has the Spanish link on its page. Is there any way to prevent this happening again? Angmering (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rastrojo,

BOTarate re-added wrong interwiki links to Tifo that I removed just one hour before.

Best regards, --zeno (talk) 12:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see that I really remove all of the links, but sometimes the bots are faster ;-) --zeno (talk) 12:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revolt of the Comuneros

Thanks for the message. I see that you worked a lot on the Spanish Wikipedia version, and thanks a bunch. I ran across the revolt by pure chance in July or so, and was disappointed at Wikipedia's short article... but noticed the star on the Spanish article. My Spanish isn't great (rusty stuff from high school mostly, though I am taking a refresher course now on it), but translating it was a ton of fun, as was researching it afterward.

For what it's worth, I do intend to submit this to the English Featured Articles board eventually, but from what I understand they're pretty finicky about page numbers. I don't quite have the article cited up to the bulletproof standard I think they want, but hopefully it'll be there soon. I figure I'll put it up for a peer review first, then bring it to FAC.

Since you asked, there is something you can do, if you're up for it. There are still a lot of redlinks in the article for topics that don't have articles, like Pedro Girón. Additionally, some of the articles are really stubby - compare Francisco Maldonado to es:Francisco Maldonado. If you'd be up for doing even a little work on fleshing out those articles and translating the Spanish versions, that'd be much appreciated. (Maybe, and this is a while off, it'd be neat to have a whole Revolt of the Comuneros Featured Topic, and we'd want a swarm of good articles around the main one to pull that off.) SnowFire (talk) 00:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, another question. The picture Image:Juan_de_Padilla.gif which you uploaded... do you know the artist / date of the work? I can't find anything in my searches and the books I have don't seem to use that picture. I mean, by common sense it's obviously a 19th century work and safe, but I can see a legalistic type complaining and wondering if it was actually made in 1926 but in an old-fashioned style or something.

On another note, do you think the Spanish article would be interested in a version of Image:BattleofTordesillas.PNG? Should be easy enough to change "Count" to "Conde," and I'd be happy to make that variant if you want.

Thanks again for all the work on the original article. SnowFire (talk) 22:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Also missed this before, but any particular reason why you don't want the Spanish flag on the Template? It's a pretty common feature on templates like that such as Template:United States topics. SnowFire (talk) 00:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Almost forgot to mention it, but I uploaded the Spanish version of that map awhile back: Image:BatalladeTordesillas.PNG. Probably not as necessary for Spanish audiences who are more likely to know where those towns are in Spain, but whatever.

Next, two questions. First, the celebration in Toledo mentioned at the end of both the English and Spanish article. I see that it's run by Tierra Comunera, a somewhat niche political party... how big/important is this party? I don't want to overhype its importance compared to, say, the main celebration in Villalar which has government backing.

Secondly, you removed the Cross of Burgundy flag before. How strongly do you disagree with that there? Because I think that a flag will spice things up and make that template stand out, and since Charles was the new King and all it strikes me as appropriate. Sure, the individual kingdoms had their own flags, but this would be Charles' flag over them all - Spain is usually dated back to either Charles or the Ferdinand & Isabella combination. SnowFire (talk) 05:46, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have another question. Apparently Villalar renamed itself back in 1932, considerably earlier than I thought, at least according to es:Villalar de los Comuneros. While I don't doubt it's true, you wouldn't happen to have / know where a source is for that, would you? I checked the official website linked at the bottom of the article, but couldn't find much. SnowFire (talk) 07:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question to confirm: The source you used to make Image:Localización del movimiento comunero.svg was Perez's Los Comuneros, right? Came up in the FAC, and I'm pretty sure that backs it anyway even if it's not what you used. SnowFire (talk) 02:31, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated bot mistake for What Dreams May Come

Bots keep coming to the article on the novel What Dreams May Come and adding a link to the French article on the film. I keep removing it, but bots keep returning and putting it back. marbeh raglaim (talk) 02:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding interlanguage wiki links to dabs

How many more bots will have to be reverted on this article? --KP Botany (talk) 08:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI notification

There is a discussion about your editing at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Rastrojo. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leonese language

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why you deleted the given number of Leonese speakers? The figure I wrote is written on a scientific paper published by one of the major academic publishers in Europe. --Eldrewitsch (talk) 15:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should talk. If we want a good article (at least I want it) I see there are just little things where we don't agree. I think both must have the purpose of reach an agreement. I just want to improve the article, this one and so others about my fields of interest. If you want to talk about a common agreement, I'll have no problem. Regards, --Auslli (talk) 08:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior in Leonese language article is unacceptable. Please stop with this attitude, it very close to a vandal one.--Abisch (talk) 08:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Leonese language -Numbers of speakers and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eldrewitsch (talk • contribs) 18:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BOTarate

Parece que estas practicando con mi página de usuario, véase aquí. --TownDown (talk) 13:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eldrewitsch

Hi, you might be interested in the above sockpuppetry case (and the associated CheckUser results), which involves the Leonese language article. -- Luk ^talk 08:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Morgan

Hello. Is there any chance to persuade your bot not to add polish interwiki in this article? pl:Harry Morgan is about a fictional character, and there is none about this actor yet. Thanks in advance. Cheers, batwing (talk, contribs) 10:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Official coat of arms

The description is "official", the coat of arms is just a user creation. The superior version I used also follows that description. Adelbrecht (talk) 13:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It includes neither version. The version in this document is made by a heraldic artist, the one you use by a user on wikimedia and the one I use too. The difference is that the version I use is updated to be more uniform with other versions. Adelbrecht (talk) 15:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

You are reverting my edits. Why is that. "Pillars of Hercules" did not include a "official" version, and I did not remove the "official" version from "Coat of arms of Spain". Adelbrecht (talk) 22:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darker and lighter colors do happen, as a kind of "shading". See the work of Hugo Gerhard Ströhl. And look at the crown of the official version File:Escudo de España (mazonado).svg, it also has a gradient. (But in that case, I think it's wrong because the colour will change from the official laws)Adelbrecht (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archivos Usuario Heralder

Buenas tardes,

Soy un usuario que está creando archivos siguiendo estilo del Usuario Sodacan. He visto que has modificado los archivos que he creado en varios artículos en inglés, te ruego que no lo hagas porque estoy realizado mi trabajo para complementar el estilo predominante en la versión inglesa. He visto en la página de discusión de Usuario Miguillen una guerra de ediciones con otro usuario, yo no voy a sustituir los archivos del grupo heraldico español en la versión de la Wikipedia en este idioma, ni voy entrar en guerras de ediciones como he visto que ha ocurrrido. Te ruego que respetes estos diseños (estoy trabajando en otros escudos para la wikipedia en inglés). Te ruego respeto, como yo respeto tu trabajo en la versión española. Mis trabajos han sido bien recibidos en la versión en inglés porque mantienen el estilo predominante en la misma. Tengo todo el derecho a ver publicados y respetados mis trabajos. He visto los argumentos del Usuario Miguillen para defender la presencia de sus versiones como el Escudo de Navarra, en su página de discusión y deseo también respetar vuestro trabajo, no discutiré ni trataré de reemplazar la presencia (en la Wikipedia en inglés) de la versión del escudo de Navarra porque me parece razonable. También mantengo la versión del escudo real de España hecha por el grupo se ha respetado en el artículo Spanish Heraldry (para que quede reflejada en la versión en inglés el estilo del grupo español de heráldica que crea archivos en Commons). Te pido por favor que respetes la presencia de mis archivos porque se ajustan al estilo predominante de la versión en inglés (deseo trabajar con este estilo y no el vuestro), si deseas cambios puedes pedir un arbitraje, si vuelves a retirar mis archivos solicitaré yo el arbitraje. Como te he dicho he respetado en algunos casos la presencia (Navarra, Spanish Heraldry) de vuestros archivos porque me parece razonable, te ruego una vez más que lo seas tu conmigo y que aceptes la presencia de escudos de diferentes estilos que pueden convivir perfectamente cada uno en su ámbito. En caso contrario, como digo podemos recurir a un arbitraje o decisión de administradores pero por favor, sin guerra de ediciones. Espero que podamos encontrar una solución lo más satisfactoria para todos.

Respeto también presencia de la versión del escudo del rey de España de vuestro grupo en Titles of Spanish Crown (no ha llegado a modificarse) y por supuesto la versión oficial del escudo de España (porque es incuestionable que deba figurar en los artículos sobre España, Escudo de España y barras de navegación sobre política y Estado Español). Ruego también comprensión por vuestra parte, Saludos

--Heralder (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tierra de Campos

Please stop reverting edits in Tierra de Campos. I created the article and the map is sourced. You just have to check the sources provided in the article, among which the following:

I respected your map according to Justo González Garrido's point of view of the region. Please do respect mine instead of claiming absolute exclusivity for González Garrido's narrow definition of the boundaries of the comarca.Xufanc (talk) 21:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the consideration. I want to make clear that I do value and respect González Garrido's definition of Tierra de Campos. Still, in the Spanish Wikipedia "Tierra de Sahagún" is included in the Tierra de Campos category. Moreover, the text of the first Diario de León article says: Así, sólo queda Sahagún, una de las capitales tradicionales de la Tierra de Campos. Sahagún, however is not included as part of Tierra de Campos in this map here, where only the southermost part is shown under that name. Do you know why González Garrido did not include the Leonese areas in his map? Xufanc (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

My name is Victor Grigas and I'm a Storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation. We're exploring new ways to explain why Wikipedia is so special and we’ve started a Wikipedia Stories Project, where we’re chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community, especially editors and active contributors in the movement like you. I'll be traveling to Wikimania next month to collect stories for our 2011 Fundraiser. While there I'd love the chance to meet with you and hear your thoughts about Wikipedia. We’ll have a schedule of available times for you to sign up if you’re interested, but right now, we’d like to make the initial contact to gauge your interest. Please let me know by emailing me at vgrigas@wikimedia.org or responding on my talk page.

thank you,

Victor Grigas (talk) 20:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Armorials design at the English Wikipedia

Hello

The latest version showed the widely heraldic used at the English Wikipedia, please don´t revert.

At Coats of arms of the autonomous communities of Spain, the earlier version didn´t show the official design in all cases. All the latest versions are right acording to sources. You can check all have the same elements comparing versions and you can check most of the earlier versions aren´t official at the sources. In adition the earlier gallery had different designs so the final result is worse (I think It is easy to check, comparing the different version) (in heraldry is common that the Armorials show the same style, it is a basic rule). Finally There aren´t reasons for changes, and this designs are widely used at the Spanish Wikipedia, different designs should be showed, specially if this style is the used at the English Wikipedia Heraldic Galleries e.g. List of coats of arms of the United Kingdom Coat of arms of the United Kingdom List of coats of arms of France.

Please, not delete again don´t wars of edition, Solid arguments for latest version are showed

if one user wants to rever please : use the dispute resolution guidelines.

I left this message at the discussion section of the article last month.

Thanks you

--Galico (talk) 03:23, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of Spain

why do you keep reverting and refuse to discuss? Tinynanorobots (talk) 23:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you say, but there is no record of such discussion, and I hardly think you and heralder having a private constitutes reaching a consensus. Tinynanorobots (talk) 22:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is appropriate to discuss it on the discussion page and in English. Is that too much trouble? Tinynanorobots (talk) 23:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

La Lifa Play-Off

Hola Rastrojo, yo tampoco lo veo coherente que las segundas fases de Segunda, Segunda B y Tercera se les llame a su play-off por la categoría a la que ascenderán, pero lo que no se puede hacer es renombrar a libre alvedrío, lastimar todos los enlaces, no discutir el porque (se debería consensuar), además de que si se aplica el cambio para Segunda, deberías modificar el nombre de los play-offs de Segunda B y Tercera porque sería incoherente y no uniforme, además que hay que cambiar ese nombre en todos los años, o sea que es una cuestión de uniformidad, hacer las cosas con consenso y aplicar todos los cambios a todo lo relacionado. Saludos - tot-futbol (talk) 11:51, 23 June 2012 (CEST)

Me parece correcto, a ver quien se atreve a hacer todos los cambios, a mi me da un poco de pereza, aunque si tengo un rato libre lo podría hacer, si a caso hacemos mitad y mitad. Saludos - tot-futbol (talk) 12:00, 23 June 2012 (CEST)

Hola Rastrojo, tal como me comentaste de ejemplo de la liga inglesa, no pongas 2011-12 ... sino 2012 ... Estoy haciendo completando la Segunda División próxima y ya contemplo la nomenclatura del artículo 2013 Segunda División play-offs. Haré los cambios para las temporadas de Segunda B y Tercera de 1990 a 2001, de momento. Saludos - tot-futbol (talk) 22:13, 27 June 2012 (CEST)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SPATRA reactivation

Hello Rastrojo, I notice that you were involved in the project Wikipedia:Spanish Translation of the Week a few years ago. However I also notice that here has been very little activity since 2007. This is a project I'm particularly interested in and would love to see it revived. I've taken the bold step of identifying an article requiring translation and I'm in the process of inviting collaboration. The article History of Puerta del Sol could really use your help. In addition, I'd welcome any ideas you may have to help revive this project so that there is greater collaboration among ES>EN translators on en.Wikipedia. I'm identifying various contributors from whom the SPATRA project may benefit. If you have any recommendations then feel free to contact them directly or submit there usernames to me via my talkpage. I look forward to your participation. Gratefully - EagerToddler39 (talk) 02:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot in Ukrainian Wikipedia

Hi. You have received this message, because you have a bot in Ukrainian Wikipedia. For a long time, your bot has not committed any actions in our project. Currently, Ukrainian Wikipedia community decides what to do with inactive bots. We encourage you to visit this page and inform the community whether you would need the bot flag in the future, and if so, why. If you no longer need the flag, we would be grateful if you inform the community.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page, or place them on the page to which I have referred. Unfortunately, I cannot look at all the pages, so if you ask the question here, most likely, I can not answer.

We expect a response from you within a week of receiving this message.

Thank you for attention. Best regards, bureaucrat of Ukrainian Wikipedia Максим Підліснюк (talk) 19:37, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rastrojo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rastrojo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rastrojo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I leave at your discretion...

Greetings mate! (apologize for using an online translator)

You may be interested in reviewing or participating in the review and cleaning of some articles related to a series of articles related to the Institute of San Isidro and a supposed historical entity of students of said school.

Several users are working on disassembling the assembly, as you can read here [1], or in the discussion of the article in WP:Catalan, also reformed and sanitized. Another English colleague is working on this project [2], where a thorough cleaning has also been requested...[3], y and in whose CdB (AfD) maybe you are interested in participating, without commitment naturally.--Latemplanza (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:CB Valladolid Logo.svg

Thank you for uploading File:CB Valladolid Logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hello, Rastrojo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]