User talk:BOT823

Welcome

Hello BOT823, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
• Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
• Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

• Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

BOT823, good luck, and have fun. --Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Prince Harry of Wales. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Understand it's not needed BOT823 (talk) 21:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Upper Poppleton has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Upper Poppleton was changed by BOT823 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854957 on 2013-04-11T21:33:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Bus Routes

Wikipedia is not a directory, Stop reverting/added bus routes! – →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Yes this is fine but could be added about any mention of the routes e.g North to South of city and the Places they Go e.g in Acomb they is many routes into the City. BOT823 (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Username issue

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "BOT823", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because , per WP:IU, "The following types of username are not permitted ... Usernames which could be easily misunderstood to refer to a "bot" (which is used to identify bot accounts)...". If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Transdev York Unibus route 44 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transdev York Unibus route 44 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transdev York Unibus route 44 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)