User talk:BLong

Image Tagging for Image:Mmstc_logo_300ppi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mmstc_logo_300ppi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Succession box at Bulbasaur

Please do not add succession boxes to Pokémon articles. The {{Pokeinfobox}} template has the information that is included in those succession boxes, and the pictures are not necessary, either. Ryūlóng 04:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is the common MoS that WP:PCP follows that the succession is in the pokeinfobox. Besides, there are more than 400 articles on separate Pokémon; do you really want to add a succession box to all of them? Ryūlóng 04:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But the pictures are not at all necessary for the succession box. I will concede that the succession box would be useful at the bottom, but please do not link the pictures, as all 400 images would have to be put under fair use doctrine for where they are used. Ryūlóng 04:37, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where as that could be useful, generally the evolutions (except for pre-evos and new evos added during the latter generations) are redundant, and would have very little to add, as the evolutions are often cited. Ryūlóng 04:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add the template to articles, it is made redunandt by Template:Pokeinfobox. H ig hway ^{Return to Oz...} 14:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well the mauin problem is that there are going to be around 500 Pokémon, nad there are 4 different Pokédexes, so it's going to be rather bulky. Personally, I think you should ask at WT:PCP, and see what the consensus is, butI just feel that some members will revert you otherwise. Cheers, H ig hway ^{Return to Oz...} 09:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]