User talk:BF93

BF93, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BF93! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello, I'm Infoupdates36. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Please refrain from continuing to add content to the Signature Bank that is better suited for other locations. As previously stated, information regarding individual board members are better suited for articles specifically about those board members. Infoupdates36 (talk) 15:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Signature Bank, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Welltraveled (talk • contribs) 21:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Please stop reverting edits on the Signature Bank page without explanation Welltraveled (talk) 03:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Welltraveled (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure as to why you continue to undo edits made to the Signature Bank page. Your last comment indicates that you think The Bank is removing negative information - but I am not the bank, nor am I removing any information. The line in the first paragraph about President Donald Trump is duplicative, as it is also in the Relationship section. The "Board of Directors" section is also duplicative, as that information already exists in the "Barney Frank Controversy" and "Relationship" section. The renaming of the "Ponzi Scheme" section was adding additional context. Please refrain from undoing these edits again unless you have a legitimate reason to do so. Welltraveled (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Signature Bank

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:36, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Signature Bank for a discussion proposal

Please see Talk:Signature Bank#Proposed Edits for Discussion, opened by Welltraveled (talk · contribs). Consider joining the discussion there, in hopes of reaching agreement}}. See also WP:Dispute resolution for further steps that are open to both of you. As you know there was recently a dispute about the content of Signature Bank. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:12, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BF93. If you keep reverting at Signature Bank without participating in the existing talk page discussion, you are risking a block for edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring, as you did at Signature Bank. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

After my above warning, you made this revert on 16 February, without making any effort to get consensus on the talk page for this change. A discussion needs both parties to participate. It seems that you refuse to discuss. 21:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Welltraveled (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit further until you respond at ANI. Doing so may result in you being blocked from editing w/o further warning. Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:00, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]