User talk:BERKİYA

August 2021

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed content from Naqadeh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 22:11, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Salt Bae. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Salt Bae, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Salt Bae was changed by BERKİYA (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854357 on 2021-08-16T15:54:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jambiya. Serols (talk) 16:44, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 17:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Zakarid Armenia‎, you may be blocked from editing. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added 6 sources, six were removed by you. why don't you have a source? The Zakarid family is a Kurdish family. and it will remain so. BERKİYA (talk) 09:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zakarid Armenia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 10:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rawadid dynasty have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rawadid dynasty was changed by BERKİYA (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90525 on 2021-09-09T12:38:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Pshdar dog, you may be blocked from editing.

You are deliberately introducing factual errors without sourcing. Please cease this activity. William Harris (talk) 06:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my information with sources and has been removed. why BERKİYA (talk) 14:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you use the word vandalism in an edit summary again, I'll block you

You aren't reverting vandalism, you are reverting edits that offend your Kurdish point of view. Content disputes aren't vandalism. And you've had enough warning already to make me think that you are WP:NOTHERE but only here to push your point of view. Doug Weller talk 14:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you care about the "edited" information that was deleted by the Armenians and Persians, although it was the source. let me guess you're a "democrat" sg amk cuuuu BERKİYA (talk) 14:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I believe in elected governments and not dictatorships, but that has nothing to do with the above. I need to know what sg amk cuuuu means by the way. It will help me make decisions about you. Doug Weller talk 14:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Since Berkiya is refusing to answer, I'll do him the honor; According to Google Translate, "sg amk cuuuu" means "tell your mom sooo" in Arabic. Not the first time he has made such remarks in another language it seems [1] (this is in Turkish). Looks like he just attempted to WP:CANVASS as well [2]. Looking at his edits, he has a history of ethno-nationalistic pov pushing, such as here; [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This needs to stop. Doug Weller talk 16:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What !!!!!!!!!!! Arabic!!!!! Are you kidding me ?!!!??!??? It doesn't make any sense, I meant to say you're confused BERKİYA (talk) 16:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm expected to understand that? This is the English language Wikipedia and we ask users to use English to communicate. It's very rude to say something to someone in a language they don't understand. And you haven't explained the "democrat" comment. Doug Weller talk 16:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. It seems like it's Turkish, I remember now. It's used as a slang in Denmark as well :). Amk is an abbreviation for 'Amina Koyim', which means...well... I'll let Google tell the readers that [9]. This more makes sense, since his other remark was in Turkish as well. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

listen, I am sharing information with sources but you are removing my information, why???? . You do not interfere with those who share the notes of a racist Armenian historian , it means you are not the racist me . By the way, Historyofiran is constantly hostile to Kurds. I have been using Wikipedia for months, whenever I see anti-Kurdish movements, there is Historyofiran. Why did I say democrat, because you are one of the fake democrats, you think that you apply "equal" rules to everyone, but when it comes to the Kurds, you suddenly have a strange attitude. I'm tired of dealing with you ce historyofiran. Historyofiran is exactly the country of "terrorist country" like "Iran" BERKİYA (talk) 16:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amk; akle sıvıka mın kurek (kurdish) confused kid BERKİYA (talk) 17:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. @HistoryofIran: I've copied his post about you there. Doug Weller talk 17:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enough BERKİYA (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you apparently prefer to communicate with the users in a language they do not understand, my pleasure: ja zablokiroval Vashu uchjotnuju zapis' na 31 chas, i sledujushhaja blokirovka, skoree vsego, budet bessrochnoj, esli Vy, nakonedc, ne nauchites' sebja vesti i ne pojmjote, chto Vikipedija - jenciklopedija, a ne pole bitvy. V dopolnenie k jetomu, my zdes' ne terpim oskorblenija, na kakom by jazyke oni ne byli napisany.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Hanifa Dinawari, you may be blocked from editing. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 12:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you continued exactly the same behavior after the block has expired, and in fact you have never acted differently, I do not see any other choice.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]