User talk:BDollars

February 2008

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --> You edits to the John Black article, removing verified information, is considered vandalism. Cease. KellyAna (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.. Your repeated false additions to the John Black article constitutes vandalism. Stop. KellyAna (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andre DiMera

It is impossible for him to be John's nephew since it has been established under the new writing team that John and Stefano are Santo's only sons and Andre was Stefano's "nephew" but no one ever knew how. He could have been the son of a former lover but it doesn't matter, he is not related to John. Do not add him again as that is considered vandalism, adding false information. KellyAna (talk) 15:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Daniel Case (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]