User talk:BCSBowls01
Proposed deletion of 2015 Florida State vs. Georgia Tech football game
[edit]
The article 2015 Florida State vs. Georgia Tech football game has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Single football games, even ones with exciting endings, do not generally warrant standalone articles; and this content can be included at other pages, e.g. Florida State–Georgia Tech football rivalry.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnInDC (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of 2015 Florida State vs. Georgia Tech football game for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Florida State vs. Georgia Tech football game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Florida State vs. Georgia Tech football game until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnInDC (talk) 20:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Evans County, Georgia article's Demographic's section
[edit]Hi,
I saw where you blanked a good bit of information on the Demographics section on the Evans County, Georgia page. I've been working on that page off and on for a while was wondering what your reasons were for the deletion? Reb (talk) 23:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
I did that on the Claxton page, not Evans County. I brought back the 2000 Census racial makeup data on that after deleting everything else related to 2000, as that census is now outdated with the one we have now that will be outdated in four years.
My mistake. I had been looking at two different things at once lol. Reb (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
I noticed you have been changing the demographic data on several articles without leaving sources. Could you please explain where you are getting your data? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
American FactFinder. Check the data.
October 2016
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Doddsville, Mississippi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for adding sources to your most recent edits. Please add a source to your other edits before making new edits. This will prevent them from being reverted. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- At Shelby, Mississippi, you added a random link to the US Census Bureau. In fact, the link to Shelby is [1]. Please add an accurate link to the data you are sourcing or the edit will be reverted. Thanks for your cooperation. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
I have a problem with the SRCs. Since i already know the one for Shelby, how i am supposed to know the ones for other places i want to edit?
Please explain your source for the following:
- At Rosedale, Mississippi, in this edit you stated there were 12.7% whites, but the Census Bureau "http://factfinder.census.gov/bkmk/cf/1.0/en/place/Rosedale city, Mississippi/POPULATION/DECENNIAL_CNT" states there are 12.8% whites.
- At Shaw, Mississippi, in this edit you stated there were 93.0% blacks, but the Census Bureau "http://factfinder.census.gov/bkmk/cf/1.0/en/place/Shaw city, Mississippi/POPULATION/DECENNIAL_CNT" states there are 93.1% blacks.
- At Shelby, Mississippi, in this edit you stated there were 94.3% black, but the Census Bureau "http://factfinder.census.gov/bkmk/cf/1.0/en/place/Shelby city, Mississippi/POPULATION/DECENNIAL_CNT" states there are 94.8% blacks.
Please explain yourself. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I decided to do it by non-Hispanic. 94.8% was the entire Black population of Shelby including Hispanics. 94.3% is non-Hispanic black population of Shelby. Those three are all non-Hispanic Blacks.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, BCSBowls01. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, BCSBowls01. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, BCSBowls01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)